This is special. Suing because you were treated with an FDA APPROVED drug in an off label usage like millions of others in history. You recover. You live. What are the damages? Discovery? Dr. Fraudci going to testify on behalf of the incarcerated?
So this is an awfully sticky wicket for those who support the use of ivermectin. If you read the complaint it’s not there they were given ivermectin, rather it was administered without their knowledge or consent.
On one hand those who are most vocally against the vaccine are advancing the argument that there is not informed consent and the vaccines are not approved. The vaccines are approved fully and we’re approved under EUA. The argument extends to Nuremberg code violations (which is preposterous) because when you are vaccinated and boosted there was a rather large informed consent package.
It is a bit of a misdirection to say ivermectin is FDA approved. It is for the treatment of parasites. It is being used off label when used for its potential Covid benefits. I suspect that if we dug (and we can certainly see what people are saying here) are those getting ivermectin prescribed being informed it is not FDA approved for Covid and being used off label? I am guessing not.
So the question is will there be intellectual consistency here with this story. If the fact is true that these prisoners were given a medication without their knowledge then it must follow the medication was used experimentally on them without their consent (off label non approved indication with conflicting literature as to its conclusive effectiveness) and we shall see if the usual folks call for sanctions and legal consequences. It is an apple to apple analogy. We shall see if intellectual honesty now exists.
I was going to post but it’s people like you who keep me from doing so because your remarks are so on point. It’s like I think of something to say and you’re already on it. Stay away from me, okay. Outta my head, dangit!