Posted on 01/08/2022 6:09:53 PM PST by RandFan
@SkyNews
"The science isn't strong enough".
Watch the moment an unvaccinated hospital consultant challenges Health Secretary Sajid Javid over the government's policy of compulsory COVID jabs for NHS staff.
Clip...
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
WOOOO...
Slowly but surely the truth is getting out there
Actually if they reduced transmission for 8 weeks then there is an argument for them.
He said even less for omicron
You can have mine.
It also doesn’t state long term consequences because no one on Earth knows.
“He said even less for omicron”
So he says it stops omicron transmission too.
He is in fact making the argument for vaccination.
People have lost any reasoning ability.
He makes an argument against something by saying that it works quite efficiently.
This guy is a moron.
“It also doesn’t state long term consequences because no one on Earth knows.”
Thats not his argument, though.
I’m addressing what he said.
“...The science isn’t strong enough...” is his way of saying “the science existeth not”.
10 weeks for any Covid; 8 weeks for Omicron. Maybe.
Hardly worth it.
I had the J&J in March; omicron last week. The pain from the J&J shot (I got vaccine induced bursitis and then weeks of P/T) was MUCH worse than the omicron (which was like a 4 day cold plus fever).
True.
You can have mine.
It also doesn’t state long term consequences because no one on Earth knows.
Never has been a reason for the vaxx. The real doctors know it.
No, you’re wrong.
There is no argument in favor of the vaccines.
This is a mathematical truth.
Justification for any medical intervention is a result of relating potential risks with potential benefits.
There are no real safety studies, so the potential risk is certain death.
“There is no argument in favor of the vaccines”
He stated they reduce transmission.
If true that would be an argument for the vaccine.
It might not be a winning argument when all factors are taken in to account.
(And of course he is wrong, they don’t reduce transmission).
COVIDiot says what?
Don’t be an idiot.
When you said there’s an argument for the vaccine, I thought it was reasonable to assume you meant a good argument.
When all we know about the safety is that it can possibly kill you, the argument itself is dead.
Clot-shot snot says what?
Wayne’s World, Wayne’s World.
I was addressing his statement: “He tells him the vaccines are unnecessary and only reduce transmission for 8 weeks”.
If they in fact reduced transmission it would be reasonable at the least to consider them.
He said it, not me.
The vaccines don’t work. I don’t know why a guy arguing against a mandate uses a false claim that they work as his argument against the vaccine.
That's cute, you think these mandates are about science. They're about control. You're supposed to get vaccinated, because that was the order you were given. If the government ordered you to burn down your home, it would expect your home to be in flames in short order. Science has NOTHING to do with any of this.
Oh, I see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.