Posted on 11/04/2021 11:48:37 AM PDT by Morgana
That inaccurate claim is an attempt to exempt mothers who murder babies from culpability for their own actions.
The question is who, under the Texas law, is a candidate for a lawsuit should the mother get an abortion. One answer to that has to be the father, who is equally responsible for the pregnancy to begin with.
[This is called “learning the hard way.”]
I don’t think she is really “learning.”
Fatherhood parenthood are commitments.
Wanna be a father, marry the woman and keep your dick in your pants until you do. You can marry in a church, or by the government, or whatever.
But you should have no rights or responsibilities unless you are committed
Because for people who just want to have an orgasm, that is all it is.
Why, exactly, do you presume that fathers want to reject parenthood?
Because they are self-centered jerks only interested in sex? And I don't know how you can refer to someone who "rejects parenthood" as a "father". Not sure why you are asking this question other than to show your self-righteousness?
Another result of the welfare state.
The Uber driver can refuse to drive her there.
The Uber driver can refuse to drive her there.
In that situation the man has no problem, nor is there any penalty for him for not keeping his pants zipped. These men are always going to vanish into the night after they get what they want and the consequences show up.
It is not within anyone’s power to make sure there are no men like this; They are always going to be out there. It is within the woman’s power to make sure she doesn’t allow a man like this to get her pregnant.
What a harsh world we live in.
Do we really need to go into what the father could have refused to do?
No legal definition of an unborn baby including autonomy across the board, no responsibility on the man. Equal protection. If the female can murder at will, the man should have the right not to bare responsibility and be allowed to financially walk away.
Or would you have rather have this convoluted and hypocritical “cake” that females crave to eat?
We're talking about the current Texas law and the ability for third parties to sue anyone remotely connected with the abortion. So that kills your 'murder at will' excuse for letting the man off because after all without the father there would have been no abortion at all. So if you can sue the Uber driver or a person who gives directions to the abortion clinic then the father should have just as much legal liability in the matter.
I accord to fathers the exact same default presumption that women accord to mothers: that they care about their daughters and sons, and should be treated accordingly short of being proven unfit as individuals.
The countervailing presumption, that fathers reject parenthood by default, is a poisonous presumption that is destroying civilization.
The problem is Mariah is with a new guy every night. Not “where is the father”, but who is the father?
With all the multitude of birth control options, she has no excuse.
The SINGLE BIGGEST determining factor in whether a child grows up in poverty, is the mom’s failure to get married first, to a stable man with a job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.