Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jewbacca
Actually we do know that. But the burden of proof is on vaccine pushers.

You made the claim there's no benefit from the vaccine if you've had the disease. The burden is on you to back up that claim.

68 posted on 10/14/2021 11:58:04 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo

I claim it will not be proven that vaccines provide benefit to people with natural immunity.

Less than 1% of people of people with natural immunity became infected.

Natural immunity is more than 99% effective. Suppose the combination of natural immunity and vaccines is more than 99% effective. With such a small difference, to make a a
statistical proof would require a number of people I think you will not have.

- - -

Natural immunity produces different antibodies. Vaccines encourage the production of one type of antibody. If a person with natural immunity gets vaccinated, the proportion of the different types of antibodies he has might change. I expect antibodies in natural proportions to be more effective than in artificial proportions.


69 posted on 10/14/2021 12:08:45 PM PDT by TTFX ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

That’s not how mandates work, Joe.

The person mandating had the burden. You have the burden.

A burden you will not meet, as the well-known Israeli study, the Cleveland clinic study, and numerous others proved my point to anyone who is not willfully stupid.

I don’t have time to waste on you anymore.

Goodbye.


70 posted on 10/14/2021 12:47:21 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson