[Political Junkie Too]

Never forget.

if somehow identifying certain people would save lives there would of course be a public health justification.

The unvaccinated are not unhealthy. They are not sick. They are not contagious.

But you support treating them as if they were.

We used to quarantine the truly sick who showed the symptoms. You want to quarantine the unvaccinated from society for not being sick, but for simply be unvaccinated.

You want to mandate that the unvaccinated become vaccinated, when the unvaccinated are not sick, or showing signs of being sick.

They are, to you, an undesirable.

Undesirables are dehumanized by:

• first prejudicing the rest against them (Biden: “The vast majority of Americans are doing the right thing... This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.”),
• then they are made the scapegoats for whatever goes wrong (Biden: "The unvaccinated overcrowd our hospitals or overrun the emergency rooms and intensive care units, leaving no room for someone with a heart attack or pancreatitis or cancer."),
• then they are discriminated against (can't fly, can't dine out, can't go to shows, can't get surgeries),
• then they are persecuted.

Never forget.

-PJ

[semimojo]

The unvaccinated are not unhealthy. They are not sick. They are not contagious.

So how would identifying them prevent severe disease and death, which was the premise of your question?

You want to mandate that the unvaccinated become vaccinated, when the unvaccinated are not sick, or showing signs of being sick.

No I don't, but I do understand that there's a rational argument for it and it's the same one used for seat belts.

Which was the original question, BTW.