[dynoman]

This is well worth the time to read through. The PDF includes the FDA “approval” document links.

“page 12 AA (Conditions with Respect to Use of Licensed Product). This tells you that yes, we licensed the vaccine, but...there is a lot of the old vaccine out there, actually “a significant amount” and this amount will be considered an EUA and will continue to be used.

Now, why would they do that? Why specify that identical versions of the product will be legally different? Because they need the license to impose the mandates. But they need the EUA to evade liability.

Along with the license comes liability for the manufacturer. (While all EUA products were given a liability shield.)

Unfortunately, our federal governments would prefer us to be without recourse if we are injured, rather than have Pfizer defend its product in court. So, the feds want us to THINK the vaccine we are receiving is licensed, which will make people submit because they think it can now be mandated, but instead we are almost certain to receive the EUA vials instead, to save Pfizer’s behind. Yes, a stingy CICP injury program exists, but it has not paid out for a single COVID vaccine injury yet.”

This is a must read.

[Pollard]

FDA approval is for 16 and older
EUA approval is for 12-15 years old

[dynoman]

Check this out. Take your time to read through the thread and PDF. The vaccine the FDA “authorized” yesterday, Comirnaty, isn’t available yet, apparently wont be until the current Pfizer vaccine supply runs out.

[Alberta's Child]

The only problem with your line of thinking is that the EUA has nothing to do with the legal immunity. The legal immunity for vaccine producers extends to ALL vaccines, regardless of whether they are covered under a standard FDA license or an EUA.

The legal immunity has a sound rationale behind it. The whole purpose of it is to protect the manufacturer of a vaccine with serious side effects for 1% of the users when the vaccine protects a large population against a disease that has a 50% fatality rate. You don't want that pharmaceutical company keeping the product off the market out of fear of its legal exposure for the 1%.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

dynoman :" “page 12 AA (Conditions with Respect to Use of Licensed Product).
This tells you that yes, we licensed the vaccine, but...there is a lot of the old vaccine out there, actually “a significant amount” and this amount will be considered an EUA and will continue to be used.
Now, why would they do that? Why specify that identical versions of the product will be legally different?
Because they need the license to impose the mandates. But they need the EUA to evade liability.

"..Unfortunately, our federal governments would prefer us to be without recourse if we are injured, rather than have Pfizer defend its product in court.
So, the feds want us to THINK the vaccine we are receiving is licensed, which will make people submit because they think it can now be mandated, but instead we are almost certain to receive the EUA vials instead, to save Pfizer’s behind. (Emphasis mine).
Yes, a stingy CICP injury program exists, but it has not paid out for a single COVID vaccine injury yet.
This is a must read "

Anywhere else, this is called :" Bait and Switch" , constitutes fraud, and promotes ignorance of which version of vaccine you receive.
This is a must read