Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
The anti-vaxxers have made very big deal about the vaccines only having a EUA. Wouldn’t it be hypocritical to adopt this nose spray that has the same level of approval?

It depends on what the underlying biological mechanisms are for the product. mRNA vaccines are a brilliant development, but so far the track record in the lab has been a dismal failure and the human results are questionable.

If this product is based on known antiviral agents , then that’s an entirely different story.

42 posted on 07/23/2021 2:19:49 AM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: gitmo

gitmo wrote: “It depends on what the underlying biological mechanisms are for the product. mRNA vaccines are a brilliant development, but so far the track record in the lab has been a dismal failure and the human results are questionable.”

Perhaps ‘earlier’ results were unsuccessful but these vaccines have proven to be very successful. Over 160 million fully vaccinated. Very few issues. Hospitalizations and deaths have fallen steadily as the numbers of vaccinated have risen.
Sure, it’s new technology but do you want to forego all medical advances returning to the days of cowpox?


48 posted on 07/23/2021 5:40:10 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson