They all do.
Danger of “delta variant” is exaggerated to continue the fear. Fear allows populaces to be manipulated.
Dr. Yeadon, former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer’s Allergy and Infectious Diseases division, said that a researcher located those who’d had SARS1 in 2003 and tested them this year, with that original SARS1 virus. Those people were still immune, after 17 years.
The researcher then tested those people with SARS2 (Covid). Those people were immune. There is ‘only’ a 22% difference in the genomes between Sars1 and Sars2 and so immunity held.
But note those ill in 2003 did not maintain active antibodies for 17 years. Their immune sytem hibernated those (my words) antibodies until it recognized the pathogen from years ago and began producing antibodies.
There are two wings to the immune system and Big Pharma is focusing on ‘active antibodies’ as if that is an accurate indicator of immunity. It actually means ‘activated immunity’, when you may have immunity but haven’t been exposed in so long you don’t have the antibodies.
Dr. Yeadon says the ‘variants’ are no more than 1% or 2% different from Covid and those who’ve had Covid will be immune to the variants.
The Deep State just wants a repeat performance, They want to put us through the lockdowns and panic as if it never happened before; they like the way we obeyed and want to see it again. Only this time they are going to punish those who called them out on their lies. :(
If you survive the initial injection of the stuff.
Let’s whip out those studies to show proof ... no studies... just a SWAG by Faux Fauci!!!!!!
Posted on 7/4/2021, 1:22:23 PM by E. Pluribus Unum
2 things of interest to me:
1. BIAS - Note the definitive title...No doubt...J&J protects against Delta Vriant
Title:
Johnson & Johnson says COVID-19 vaccine protects against the Delta variant
Actual text: Lots of wiggle words (I have put in CAPS).
Though the analysis was conducted on only a SMALL number of participants and HASN’T YET BEEN PEER-REVIEWED, it SUGGESTS that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, like the Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines, MAY provide a buffer for the U.S. against the highly transmissible variant.
Because Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine is very SIMILAR to Pfizer’s vaccine (they’re both mRNA vaccines), experts think it will LIKELY confer a similar amount of protection. But less was known about how protective Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine would be against the delta variant. Some experts predicted that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine would confer similar protection against delta as the AstraZeneca vaccine because they use the same platform,
And so What about Pfizer...Actually this popped up today...No information about the specific study or if it was peer reviewed...
The Pfizer COVID vaccine is 70 PERCENT effective against the new ultra-contagious Delta variant, claims a new study from the Hebrew University, according to Kan. This is compared to an approximately 95% rate of effectivity of the vaccine against earlier strains of COVID.
According to the study, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is also less effective at preventing people infected with the Delta variant from developing serious symptoms.
Earlier today, Haaretz reports on Health Ministry figures that indicated that the Delta variant is responsible for more than 90% of new COVID cases in Israel over the past two weeks; compared to just 60% of new cases in the country just two weeks ago.
Very sloppy reporting.
“Though the analysis was conducted on only a small number of participants and hasn’t yet been peer-reviewed...”
Translated: NOT scientific.
But “trust us”...
Is this the same Johnson and Johnson that are the makers of leviquen that has caused catastrophic side affects. . (I know about a few personally) https://duckduckgo.com/?q=johnson+and+johnson+leviquen&atb=v261-1__&ia=web