Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Up until December 2019, Herd Immunity was Officially Defined by the CDC as a Combination of Vaccinated and Natural Immunity by those recovered. Why did it Change quietly with NO valid reason??

Do we really need a vaccine for a virus with a greater than 99% survival rate?

Why are they trying to SELL this Fake Vaccine so hard to the masses?

I could go on, but.


2 posted on 07/03/2021 4:31:02 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eyeamok

If you knew there were truly safe and effective treatments for COVID, and even safe and effective preventative measures you and your family members could take, the whole issue goes away. You won’t need the shot, and the “Emergency Use Authorization” for the vaccine injections would be no longer valid.

But if you go to your same sources and type “hydroxychloroquine” or “ivermectin,” you get a response dated Nov. 9, 2020: “A National Institutes of Health clinical trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has formally concluded that the drug provides no clinical benefit to hospitalized patients” and “WHO ‘strongly’ against hydroxychloroquine use for COVID-19.” For ivermectin, you get articles on “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”

Check for yourself.

However, If you go to Bitchute with the same question, you are presented with the banned videos from America’s Frontline Doctors explaining their experience with using HCQ and ivermectin to prevent and cure COVID. Rumble shows videos about studies from doctors and scientists about how effective they are.


5 posted on 07/03/2021 4:45:18 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

“Do we really need a vaccine for a virus with a greater than 99% survival rate?”

Let’s say it has a 99.5% survival rate. That means if 50% of Americans get COVID there will be 800,000 deaths. Doesn’t preventing that many Americans from dying justify a vaccine?


9 posted on 07/03/2021 4:59:49 PM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok
Do we really need a vaccine for a virus with a greater than 99% survival rate?

The people who may spend the rest of their lives regularly gasping for air, have colostomy bags, etc. and who spent many days if not weeks extremely ill, spent time in the hospital, the ICU, etc. would have probably preferred getting the jab vs. going through all of that even though they "survived." That's a totally bogus argument.

Why are they trying to SELL this Fake Vaccine so hard to the masses?

Because since apparently you did not notice, there was a pandemic that needed to be curbed. When viruses lose hosts, it has no where to go, and it dies down...and that's what happened. The vaccine certainly isn't fake, either.

I could go on, but.

I'm sure you could - and it would all be just as inaccurate as the rest. It's way past time for reality to set in.

23 posted on 07/03/2021 7:17:49 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok
Why are they trying to SELL this Fake Vaccine so hard to the masses?

Yep. The aggressive campaign by the media to get this shot is what has me questioning it.

34 posted on 07/04/2021 7:27:20 AM PDT by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson