You built up a straw man to argue against.
You have no idea who I am. But you build up something in your mind so that it makes it easy to dismiss what is being said. And you’ve done that all throughout this thread.
And to be fair, I don’t know you, or anyone else here. Most people here do not know who is on the other end of the screen name.
It doesn’t matter to me. I don’t argue personalities, i argue about ideas and topics and facts and reality. everyone posting here has a right to speak about anything, except per Jim’s caucus safe spaces, there’s no criteria that must be met in order to weigh in on a topic. Your personal experience has no bearing regarding someone talking about statistical data results. Mine doesn’t either. When we talk societal patterns and biases it doesn’t matter what race I am, or what gender you are.
Your premise I’m not happy or successful or whatever because I don’t talk about myself is laughable and ridiculous. It has no bearing on why I make a case for or against something. Formyou to assume the things you do is unintelligent and again, you attempt to make up a strawman you can then go and argue against.
Put it this way, I don’t care who you are. If I think you’re right I will agree with you. If I don’t I will disagree with you. Me agreeing with you or disagreeing with you has nothing to do with if I know you personally, or know more about you. If I believe you’re right, I agree. It’s not predicated on anything other than that. Its why I have disagreed with someone on one topic thread, and then a few threads later on something else, we’re in agreement.
If that were my premise. You see what you do?
You're not happy or successful because of the obvious anger and hatred you have toward the institution of marriage, and obviously went through some terrible experiences. It's logic, and most everyone can deduce that from your posts, Sherlock.