Posted on 06/22/2021 2:45:03 PM PDT by ransomnote
Raheem and his young protege Natalie what’s her name.
Gee willikers, mister! That can't possibly be true.The government wants to disarm us after 245 yrs 'cuz they plan to do things we would shoot them for!If it was, Guilty Google would be suppressing stories about the WuFlu plague originating at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to hide their complicity and guilt!
At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...
"Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand." ~ Putt's Law
See? I KNEW there was a reason I never trusted Goober! I don’t even like Microslop. As soon as I get moved, I’m switching to Linux, and I already use Duckduckgo.
I hate these megarich people who only want to play God with people’s lives.
‘Face
;o]
Thanks for the ping, Nully!
‘Face
;o]
Oh you mean Google FB and Twitter??
Goggle, FakeBoob, and Twatter.
How could I forget the last two?
Gettin’ old I guess...
Funny, I don’t remember gettin’ old...
Of course, when Big Tech banned dissenting science, they relied upon dogmatic edicts from WHO and NIH which were, in turn, based upon publications in scientific journals.
It is fascinating how established scientific journals like The Lancet, Nature, and JAMA have beclowned themselves over the past eighteen months with rushed publication of ridiculously phony HCQ studies, dubious studies that emphasized the zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2, expressly politicized proclamations in China’s interest, and appointments of a deeply-conflicted Peter Daszak to lead investigations into the origin of the Wuhan virus.
Maybe it’s just a coincidence that the modern industry of scientific journalism was shaped by Robert Maxwell, the father of Jeffrey Epstein’s girlfriend, consigliere, and procuress.
Back in 2017 Britain’s left-wing newspaper The Guardian published a long article about how Robert Maxwell “created” the modern scientific publishing industry titled, “Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?” The clear answer to that question is “YES”.
Regarding the Google funding, one must recognize two essential facts.
1) The particular project reported here did not involve horseshoe bats and the coronaviruses they harbor. (Fructivore bats are large bats that eat fruit (suborder Macrochiroptera). They are a very small, but not insignificant, part of the south Asian diet. Horseshoe bats are very small insectivores that are scientifically called microbats (suborder Microchiroptera). They are much too small to serve as a significant source of protein in the human diet and have no commercial market.)
2) Money is fungible. Even though Google funded virological research at Wuhan that was unrelated to coronaviruses, their contributions enhanced the technological expertise of CCP scientists. Such expertise was necessary to conduct later gain-of-function research into coronaviruses, and that research unleashed a catastrophic plague of Biblical proportion.
It happens
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.