[qwerty1234]

Looks legit </sarc>

Picture of ‘initial’ on 5/11/21, then the second picture of the damaged cells ‘9 days later’ that has a 5/5/21 date....nothing makes an article seem legit than grotesque misstatements of the basic facts you are trying to prove ....

[HypatiaTaught]

I believe the “before” picture is not of the same patient...

Just what normal, healthy blood cells look like.

But yeah, I thought the same thing, until you watch the video and they state what each picture represents.

[polymuser]

Well, anything for some clicks...

[Tunehead54]

Read it again. As noted in the SECOND PARAGRAPH IN THE EXCERPT:

---

"Note: Ignore the dates on the images. They do not correlate to the dates of the microscopic examinations of the cells, which were captured in November and early December."

---

I am no expert but those are disturbing before/after pictures.

Before:

---

9 days after mRNA injection per caption:

---

16 days after mRNA injection per caption:

Seems that it'd be a trivial exercise to duplicate the experiment with the possible difficulty in finding a willing subject to be vaccinated given full disclosure of the dangers they may be risking as an experimental subject.

Ignore everything you may read. Trust the government and the people who think the Earth has maybe 6.5 billion too many people on it. What could possibly go wrong?