He’s doing a strawman argument.
Do you remember anyone on these threads citing his first link on mice, as evidence for the spike protein causing clots?
Because I don’t.
But somehow that flawed study, is supposed to be necessary and sufficient refutation of the idea that the spike protein really does cause clots.
It’s like doing a study where you tie someone to a battleship anchor and drop them into the Atlantic, to prove that all stories of drowning in a bathtub are impossible exaggerations.
In particular, he doesn’t look for any studies looking for clots in mice following mRNA injection, or following injections of lower quantities of spike protein.
And he ignores all the real live medical reports of clots following the jab in humans.
Incidentally, he didn’t squawk at my earlier suggestion that the Harvard study shows people have 1 billion spike proteins per ml of blood, 24 hours after the jab.
No because I checked your numbers are you were correct.