Yes, I believe there's a lot of variation and not much predictability. Some friends and relatives, invluding 90 years old, had no reaction at all. Others who were younger had bad reactions (fever, chills) and won't go back for a "booster".
What do you think of the dicussion of the results at the bottom of this study: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2021-0339/html of why they believe that the spike protein was undetectable in the blood of pfizer recipients. The test had a range down to 2 pg/ml.
I pinged ransomnote so he can determine, using his expertise, whether this study or those measurements were faked by a Gates-controlled organization.
Where's the control? Did they validate the ELISA method used?
And the sample size was three (3) people.
Oh yeah. The three subjects were the F'ING AUTHORS OF THE PAPER.
Oh, btw. THEIR OWN WORDS:
"This could be due to either a lack of ELISA antibody recognition of the recombinant form of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein produced after vaccination (despite consisting of full-length spike protein with two proline substitutions at K986P andV987P) [21], or due to cellular synthesis and release in the bloodstream of protein concentrations below the limit of detection of the assay. We cannot establish which of these two hypotheses may be true at this point in time, since BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine only contains mRNA encoding for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and, therefore, does not react with ELISA antibodies targeting other epitopes present on mature proteins (e.g., the nucleocapsid)."
This is not science, it's propaganda.
Troll.
= = = = = = =
This is what the pro-jab trolls put out. A "study" with three (3) people in it. Who are the authors of the papaer.
And one sentence on a supposedly negative test for spike protein, without validation of the test, or a control group.
And further, their own discussion says the test for spike protein is not known to react with the version of the spike protein they got a jab for. But they used it anyway and pretended the negative results were significant.
Because SCIENCE!™
There were only 3 test subjects.
The authors of the study were the test subjects.
Their own discussion says the ELISA test they used, doesn’t react with the spike protein they were testing for.
And you present it as putative “proof” (Because SCIENCE!™) that the spike protein isn’t present in the blood.
You are a fundamentally dishonest person.
Or you are so stupid you shouldn’t comment on any scientific of medical study ever again.