Replies

One, Dr. Malone did not invent the mRNA technology.

If the first thing and premise for authority is a huge exaggeration that’s a big red flag.

Here is what they are doing.

Speculating.

What they are saying is theoretical. It’s not necessarily bad scientific theory, perhaps it could be proven. Perhaps it is true in some cases.

But they are making it up that they know these things as fact.

One, Dr. Malone did not invent the mRNA technology.

If the first thing and premise for authority is a huge exaggeration that's a big red flag.

Here is what they are doing.

Speculating.

What they are saying is theoretical. It's not necessarily bad scientific theory, perhaps it could be proven. Perhaps it is true in some cases.

But they are making it up that they know these things as fact.
**********************************************************************************

Well, according to NOVOTECH, he is an inventor of the technology.

NOVOTECH is a “leading regional full-service contract research organization (CRO) in Asia-Pacific providing clinical development services across all clinical trial phases and therapeutic areas and global product development and regulatory affairs consulting through our in-house BioDesk team”

And this is what they wrote:

Dr Malone brings more than 20 years of management and leadership experience in academia, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology with deep expertise in regulatory and medical strategy for global clinical product development. Dr Malone is an internationally recognized physician and scientist for his work in the areas of clinical trials, vaccines, gene therapy, bio-defense, and immunology and specifically as one of the original inventors of DNA vaccination and multiple non-viral gene therapy technologies (RNA and DNA).

And here is one of his original documents:

Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection | PNAS

Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection R W Malone , P L Felgner , I M Verma Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 1989, 86 (16) 6077-6081; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6077

https://www.pnas.org/content/86/16/6077

You must not have even listened to the same things I have listened to. They basically said there are things that should be investigated further. And other well-qualified doctors have stated that there should be a halt to determine what is going on.

That seems prudent to me. And vaccinating children is totally irresponsible without learning more about what is going on. Especially since we now know that it is not staying stuck around the injection site.

What they are saying is theoretical. It’s not necessarily bad scientific theory, perhaps it could be proven. Perhaps it is true in some cases. But they are making it up that they know these things as fact.

You're talking about CDC, Fauci, WHO, NIH, and the Vaccine companies, right?

So, I'm confused. Your reputation as a vaxtard precedes you, and yet here you are admitting those entities don't have a clue about their own fake vax.

Please explain.