(just kidding)
Posted on 06/13/2021 2:56:08 AM PDT by Libloather
Perhaps there weren’t hundreds of millions of people being vaccinated prior to this year? Also with the COVID vaccination, each recipient is given a discharge information sheet that includes instructions on how to report any effects to VAERS. I’ve had other vaccines and was never given such information. Most people never heard of VAERS prior to COVID; most reports likely were done by medical professionals treating patients post-vaccination.
Once you have generalized self-reporting, reported results must be treated with care. The number reported is the number who died after being vaccinated, not the number who died because of vaccination. Inject saline solution into 150 million people. Instruct them on how to report any adverse reactions. How many deaths would you expect to be reported from that injection? In any given year about 730 people per hundred thousand die. For 150 million multiply that by 1500, and you’d expect about 1.1 million people to die within one year of receiving their “vaccination” (remember: it’s just saline - totally harmless).
In the real world we’ve seen 5800 deaths (roughly). Obviously it’s not been a full year yet, but it’s been about six months for some, and at least three months for most. We should have seen about 250,000 deaths among those vaccinated for COVID, even if it’s perfectly harmless, so you’ll have to excuse me if I don’t get particularly alamed that a small fraction of that number has been reported
Employees should insist on that.
A drug test, involves peeing in a cup, and subsequent instrumental analysis of the urine.
That's utterly different from requiring injection of an untested substance which has been described by the manufacturers as "experimental gene therapy" in their own government filings...and without recourse (either against the employer, since the Dementia Joe Admin has said they won't be enforcing workplace injury claims against employers for it until 2022, or against the "immunized" (C W I D T?) manufacturers, when side-effects occur.
Hostile ✖ workplace.
EEOC violation.
(just kidding)
There is no “coercion” involved. You CHOOSE to take a job. You CHOOSE to quit. No one forces you to work a given job. If you have the right to quit, then what you decide is WHAT YOU DECIDE!
Only Houston Methodist is one of THE top systems to work for, in Houston, unfortunately.
This requirement is quite telling about this Pharma-owned system, though. I’d run away from them as fast as possible, personally.
I guess, by your standard, freedom loving Houston healthcare workers could quit these jobs and work for lower level hospitals, with pay and benefit cuts, right?
Ha! That only happens in stolen from Trump election cases. 🙃
If we still has a republic it would be.
I see the need for some whistle-blowers familiar with communications between health systems and state and federal governments.
Threats and/or quid pro quos are involved.
Just a hunch.
“ FDA approval. That is the only way an experimental drug becomes a recognized vaccine.
As for it being my opinion, you are dead wrong. Read up and find out on your own, because you will not take my word for it, but you might learn for yourself, that all of these so called “vaccines” have been designated as “For Emergency Use Only” Actually it states For Emergency Use Authorization.”
———————————————————————————————
Wow, you sound a bit combative. No sure why. I just asked questions. No insults, no disagreement in my question.
I meant in your Opinion based on what you know or the facts as you see them.
Anyway, yes, I’m aware of the 3 vaccines (J&J, Pfizer, and Moderna) designation as “Emergency Use”.
Thanks for the helpful links.
So if the FDA approves the Pfizer Vaccine next week, then that settles it for you?
The logical next step for people seeking FDA approval……….
The vermin behind this biowarfare-to-get-rid-of-Trump/Great Reset, are using the “Dense Pack” scandal model perfected by the Clintons to evade responsibility.
Agree.
And, just look at who is doing their bidding.
Disruptive to the workplace environment.
EEOC violation
Hostile coercive harassment.✖
I’ve had a personal experience with Judge Lynn Hughes. He is corrupt as hell. Always rules in favor big business.
I won’t go into details, but a very big insurance company removed I filed against them in state court. The insurance company removed the case to U.S. District Court and Hughes was the Judge. He dismissed my complaint. Problem is Congress removed insurance lawsuits from the jurisdiction from Federal Courts. I pointed this out to him and he didn’t care.
I’m going back to the State Court because the judgment of Lynn Hughes was void ab initio for lack of both personal and subject matter jurisdiction.
If you do a search for ratings of Federal Judges, Lynn Hughes has a very low rating.
See my post #132.
Reagan judge Lynn Nettleton Hughes:
His federal judicial service has been hallmarked by being one of the most reversed judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. His repeated misconduct was noted by the Fifth Circuit on May 6, 2021, in an appellate opinion that sua sponte reassigned the case in addition to reversing Judge Hughes. See United States v. Khan, __ F.3d __ (5th Cir. 2021).
He is not a moron; he is corrupt, based on personal experience.
Not the yearly variant. The flu shot changes each year
Learn more
“I guess, by your standard, freedom loving Houston healthcare workers could quit these jobs and work for lower level hospitals, with pay and benefit cuts, right?”
Yep! FREEDOM! No one makes you work at place X. If you CHOOSE to do so, do so. Or don’t. YOUR CHOICE. Stop your whining!
In fact, I am sure many employees who have had staff working from home for the last 15 months are very hesitant to bring them back to the office because they know trial lawyers are salivating over the prospect of bringing COVID-related claims against them.
When it comes to COVID measures in the workplace, the employer is damned if it does, and damned if it doesn’t. If it imposes these measures, it is basically admitting that the workplace is unsafe. If it doesn’t impose them, then any employee who gets sick will sue the employer for allowing the disease to spread. And if an employers mandates vaccination, then it is potentially liable for vaccine side effects.
Are you in the medical field? Just curious if you work for a top tier system.
You actually have a good cause of action in Federal Court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.