Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul46360
Without quantifying the risks in both cases, the post is merely innuendo and anecdotal. There may well be future risks from the vaccine. But the benefits right now are in the vaccine's favor by at least 100 to 1 including the risk of breakthrough infection after vaccination.
12 posted on 05/14/2021 1:49:48 PM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: palmer
Without quantifying the risks in both cases, the post is merely innuendo and anecdotal. There may well be future risks from the vaccine. But the benefits right now are in the vaccine's favor by at least 100 to 1 including the risk of breakthrough infection after vaccination.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WOW! You are likely unaware of the documented risk of ADE from mRNA 'vaccines'

"COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials."

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease - PubMed (nih.gov)

Even though the FDA & CDC  discussed potential side-effects of the Covid-19 vaccines in an October 2020 meeting, see pg. 16 of document they never told the public about these potential risks.

The number of adverse events following Covid vaccination dwarfs all other records kept for vaccines in the CDC's VAERS database.  There are already 192,954 Reports  of adverse events following Covid vaccinations and the CDC hasn't even published more than 75% of the reports received.

COVID DATA - OpenVaers

Further, about 1% or less of actual negative reactions to vaccines are ever reported to the CDC. 

Deaths involving the elderly in nursing homes following vaccination are being explained away by empty claims of 'superspreader' or old age.

WARNING: NURSING HOME WHISTLEBLOWER, "PATIENTS DYING LIKE FLIES AFTER VACCINE"

Normally, 50 deaths or less recorded following vaccination would mean the product would be pulled from the market, but there are already over 4000 deaths reported following COVID vaccinations and that's just a fraction of the actual number.

When the public makes it past the information censors, and reports on actual impacts of these vaccinations, the truth is horrific.

Israeli People Committee’s Report Find Catastrophic Side Effects Of Pfizer Vaccine To Every System In Human Body

At the same time, the statistics and claims about deaths/illnesses from the Covid VIRUS are exaggerated, the 'efficacy' of these 'vaccines' are intentionally misleading.

Check Your Understanding Of The "Efficacy" Claims For 'Vaccines': The Claim "95% Effective" Means A Fraction Of 1% Of The Vaccinated Are "Protected" For 2 Months

There are no stats for breakthrough infections that are reliable or predictable. The "vaccines' were tested for 2 months and during that time period, some people did not become ill among the vaccinated. But that doesn't only covers a 2 month experimental period. Actual risk from vaccines will have to extend beyond the two month period, for which we don't have data. And then trhere is the demand that people be repeatedly vaccinated to supposedly maintain immunity - each time incurring a fresh load of long-lasting risk.

There are safe, effective treatments using FDA approved well-tolerated medications that do not have all these unknown, lasting risks and terrible statistics for strokes/heart attacks/clots etc. being reported by people after vaccination. These are effective on high risk, particularly vulnerable people.

Dr. McCullough's protocol cuts death by 85% and Dr. Zelenko's protocol reduces risk of dying of Covid among the medically vulnerable from 7.5% to .5%.

Otherwise, those not particularly vulnerable have much better than 99% chances of surviving Covid-19 well and developing immunity which lasts, on average, 17 years according to Dr McCullough, who's devoted his medical practice to the treatment of Covid-19 patients because he realized the CDC was not interested in treatments and instead decided to 'wait' for vaccines.

COVID Vaccine Killing Huge Numbers, Warns Leading Doctor – Liberty Sentinel [32 minute video]


22 posted on 05/14/2021 2:55:27 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: palmer

“the post is merely innuendo and anecdotal”

You are being far too dismissive.

The post proves that one side is being treated with the kidliest of gloves.

Sounds as if that side is your side and you are a little shy about admitting it.


26 posted on 05/14/2021 3:05:32 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson