Outstanding post
“Pfizer uses a chemical (PEG) known to cause anaphylaxis in many. Tests are available to determine if a person is allergic to PEG. Why aren’t people tested first?
Considerations like age, diabetes, cancer, pregnancy are ignored but then whent he person dies, they are used as excuses: “well he was almost 80 years old!” “Oh, but she had cancer, so...”
Interesting point. I fought the vaccine issue in Family Court, related to child custody some years back. At the time, I had had the opportunity to speak with a prominent vaccine injury MD, a woman who had written a book on vax and who currently runs a vaccine injury clinic in LA (she has a one year backlog for treatment!). She had ordered the MTHFR test and urine organic acid test for my youngest, and sent me a report once the results were available. The urine test revealed some information which suggested that at minimum, some dietary intervention be done before the child received any vax. Imagine my child’s pediatrician’s reaction when the report was sent to him certified with a cover letter from me. He denied anything and everything in the report, and stood by the one-size-fits-all policy for vax. Thankfully I was an engaged and informed parent, because what the pediatrician was advocating could NOT be considered real medicine.
Right now there is a bill in the TX legislature to force MDs and nurses to review risks of each vaccine with parents at each child well-visit. Predictably, conventional medical authorities are strongly opposed.
I have next to zero respect for medical practitioners who are just fine mindlessly following CDC policy, and keeping parents (or in this case, the cv19vax recipients) in the dark. Now we have people in these cv19 threads advocating vax without consent. We can only hope some of them get to come personally face to face with those of us who are standing firm. I don’t think that they would find the experience positive...