Suppressed Information About the Covid-19 Vaccine' | Vol 01 Date: 03/20/2021

MARCH 20, 2021 | Vanity, also collection of others' content

[KamperKen]

Have to give the Democrats/Stalinists and their fellow sociopaths credit; they’ve developed a ‘kinder, gentler’ form of mass murder.

[stig]

So the false vaccine can blind your cells to other pathogen/proteins/diseases that they should defeat; they are focused on finding the gene thereapy spike protein. Your cells have that instruction from mRNA. There's no way for you to tell your cells to go back to producing the wide range or to stop producing the Covid spike protein.

There are vaccines that are protein only vaccines. Flublok, Hepatitis B vaccine are in general use. They inject proteins that are expressed on the surface of the virus they are made to protect against. So if protein only vaccines have not caused this "blinding" there is no reason to suspect that the mRNA vaccine would do the same.

From my basic understanding of what was written, the 'vaccine' changes they body's ability to produce proteins that fight any enemy cells to the ability to fight the specific (covid) cells.

The effect of an mRNA vaccine is local to the injection site (Your implication is that these vaccines cause a huge systemic change to a large number of cells through out the body). It will affect cells in that area only. Remember these vaccines must be refrigerated or the mRNA degrades. So once injected into a body the half-life of the mRNA molecule kicks in and it will be gone in a couple of days. In the mean time the cells that produce the protein will present the protein to the immune system. These cells will ultimately be destroyed by the immune system. There is no replication that is passed on to other cells. So this idea that there is no way to tell the cells to go back is wrong when it comes to mRNA based vaccines.

Is that why your guy Fauci (who you hate to defend) says the vaccine' will only be effective for a short time and then you'll have to keep on getting them?

He's not my guy. I provided information from the pfizer clinical trials as to why he would say something like this. From anecdotal evidence they are seeing reinfections to people who caught COVID-19 6 months prior. They believe recovering from COVID-19 provides at least 3 months of immunity and that it wanes on an individual basis there after. We don't know yet how long the vaccines will protect an individual for.

Will they have to design a new vaccine each time a new strain is released by the Chinese?

Probably. If you take an accidental view of this and the fact that virologists in China would likely have been vaccinated for COVID-19. Then a new strain that escapes would likely not be covered by our current vaccine.

[bagster]

So if protein only vaccines have not caused this "blinding" there is no reason to suspect that the mRNA vaccine would do the same.

Yet the other doctor that Ransomnote cited seems to think so. And are you sure these 'protein only' vaccines act the same as this mRNA vaccine?

How are you so sure?

The effect of an mRNA vaccine is local to the injection site (Your implication is that these vaccines cause a huge systemic change to a large number of cells through out the body). It will affect cells in that area only.

Remember these vaccines must be refrigerated or the mRNA degrades. So once injected into a body the half-life of the mRNA molecule kicks in and it will be gone in a couple of days.

In the mean time the cells that produce the protein will present the protein to the immune system. These cells will ultimately be destroyed by the immune system. There is no replication that is passed on to other cells. So this idea that there is no way to tell the cells to go back is wrong when it comes to mRNA based vaccines.

This makes some sense, if true, but my Doctorate in common sense wonders how a liquid injected into the body would not disperse throughout the entire body. And again, Ransomnote's expert seems to disagree.

Then a new strain that escapes would likely not be covered by our current vaccine.

I'm not so concerned about viruses 'escaping' as I am of the Democrats and the Chinese purposefully releasing more and different man-made, biological weapons.

[ransomnote]

bagster: So the false vaccine can blind your cells to other pathogen/proteins/diseases that they should defeat; they are focused on finding the gene thereapy spike protein. Your cells have that instruction from mRNA. There's no way for you to tell your cells to go back to producing the wide range or to stop producing the Covid spike protein.

stig: There are vaccines that are protein only vaccines. Flublok, Hepatitis B vaccine are in general use. They inject proteins that are expressed on the surface of the virus they are made to protect against. So if protein only vaccines have not caused this "blinding" there is no reason to suspect that the mRNA vaccine would do the same.

ransomnote:

Dear stig,

I do wonder why you won't read the content before making wishful statements about the Covid 'shots'.

Your inclusion of protein only vaccines like Flublok and Hebaptitus B actually makes you look like  a disinfo specialist. Those two vaccines, while they are protein only vaccines, do not use the mRNA technology which causes the 'blinding' that vaccine experts and physicians are warning about.

Your comment 'there's no reason to suspect that the mRNA vaccine would do the same appears to be intentionaly wrong, particularly when posted on a thread specifically describing the failed history of mRNA vaccines, and the fact that they are currently ranked #2 and #3 in VAERS, out of a total of 93 vaccines, for the side effect known as 'death' after about 6 weeks of implementation 

bagster: From my basic understanding of what was written, the 'vaccine' changes they body's ability to produce proteins that fight any enemy cells to the ability to fight the specific (covid) cells.

ransomnote: That is indeed what the physicians, vaccine and immunology experts I've been reading have been warning about. 

stig: The effect of an mRNA vaccine is local to the injection site (Your implication is that these vaccines cause a huge systemic change to a large number of cells through out the body). It will affect cells in that area only.

ransomnote: All the animals in the mRNA platform trials died, from an overly enhanced immune response (immune response 'over-heated'), and this 'side effect' was not localized. Your response doesn't make sense because the so-called vaccine wouldn't work if it's effects were localized to the injection site.

VAERS and social media are full of accounts of cerebral blood clots, ADE, all over body rashes, fevers of 102. People feel sick for days, weeks or longer and details describe exhaustion and overall malaise.

Would be good if you read the materials before posting.

stig: Remember these vaccines must be refrigerated or the mRNA degrades. So once injected into a body the half-life of the mRNA molecule kicks in and it will be gone in a couple of days.

ransomnote: Again, your response is not logical. The systemic immune response is not gone in a couple of days. 

"The Moderna vaccine is viable for 12 hours after being removed from refrigeration."

Wisconsin pharmacist deliberately removed vaccine vials from refrigerator (msn.com)

The average body temperature is 98. 6 degrees so by your reasoning the vaccine would be active for 12 hours after injection; beyond that point the vaccine is considered inactive. There are no long-term studies upon which you can base your optimism because in platform trials, all the animals died and it never made it to human testing.

The reason Fauci is saying they don't know how long the immune response lasts is because it's never been proven in studies.

Still, it doesn't matter if the effects last 3 months, 6 months or longer because you can die if you have NO immune response to illnesses long before then or experience a 'runaway' immune response to a pathogen as a result of the Covid 'shot'. 

stig: In the mean time the cells that produce the protein will present the protein to the immune system. These cells will ultimately be destroyed by the immune system.

ransomnote: Medical and immunological experts explain in the post at the top of the thread, which you apparently have not read,  this therapy can induce auto immunity problems and what Vanden Bossche calls 'escape', the failure of the immune system to recognize diseases during the unknown length of time the so-called vaccine is active.

stig: There is no replication that is passed on to other cells. So this idea that there is no way to tell the cells to go back is wrong when it comes to mRNA based vaccines.

ransomnote: Physicians and experts like Vanden Bossche point out there is no way to shut off the production of the protein if it's triggering anaphylaxis, cerebal blood clots or other life threatening side effects in the patient.

The duration of the effects are unknown but, for example, in the animal trials in which the immune systems over-reacted, there's no way to tell the cells to stop producing the protein and this effect need only last long enough for the person to finally stroke out or fry their own body with an uncontrolled immune response.

There is no way to tell the cells to 'go back in time to save a struggling patient.

bagster: Is that why your guy Fauci (who you hate to defend) says the vaccine' will only be effective for a short time and then you'll have to keep on getting them?

stig: He's not my guy. I provided information from the pfizer clinical trials as to why he would say something like this. From anecdotal evidence they are seeing reinfections to people who caught COVID-19 6 months prior. They believe recovering from COVID-19 provides at least 3 months of immunity and that it wanes on an individual basis there after. We don't know yet how long the vaccines will protect an individual for.

ransomnote: They intentionally selected the PCR test because it does not indicate the presence of the Covid-19 virus, which has never been isolated anyway. The inventor of the PCR test objected to it's use because it would not function in a public health setting because it would not distinguish between who is, and who is not, sick.

So the supposed 'reinfection' of a person 6 months later is meaningless. The PCR test can falsely 'identify' Covid-19 is Coca Cola and tropical fruit because it exagerates the presence of one specific series of molecular chains which can be present in both organic and inorganic, and the WHO PCR test identifies a sequence that is present in human DNA (so anyone can test postive for 'Covid' at any time if a sequence of molecules from their own DNA is present in the sample).

It's all fake, stig. The fake pandemic was created by denying all available FDA approved drugs to treat a respiratory illness until hospitalization occured and then employing ventilators which applied excessively aggressive pressure to infected lung tissue. It was furthered by forcing covid-19 patients into nursing homes to maximize death. It was wildly exaggerated by intentionally utilizing a test known to create over 90% false positives and then counting deaths occuring within 60 days of those false positives as a 'Covid death'.

The mRNA 'shots' were developed using failed technology and basing 'results' on a test that can't determine if you are sick. The absence, to date, of any isolated sample means the tests were not developed to identify the actual virus. That's why the inventor of the test was vehement about not using the PCR for the planned-demic. You'd know this if you read the content at the top of the thread.

bagster: Will they have to design a new vaccine each time a new strain is released by the Chinese?

stig: Probably. If you take an accidental view of this and the fact that virologists in China would likely have been vaccinated for COVID-19. Then a new strain that escapes would likely not be covered by our current vaccine.

ransomnote: The vaccine is the real biowarfare agent and they are not done attacking the public with it yet. There's no reason to outsource the human immune system; we can let it function as it has throughout human history without relying on the next untested experimental 'dose' to come down the pike.

[ransomnote]

Posting from another thread so I can collect content for the next thread update in one place.

To: LibertyOh

It's Monday morning. I'm at work, so I don't have lots of time to research this for you. Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus

I'll have more time after work today to add paper citations.

36 posted on 3/22/2021, 7:45:58 AM by Myrddin

It's Monday morning. I'm at work, so I don't have lots of time to research this for you. Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus

I'll have more time after work today to add paper citations.

[ransomnote]

Dr Mike Yeadon is the former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd. He was warning about the PCR test back in 2020, and flat out stating that the covid pandemic was fake, intentionally fake, in this article from Sept 2020, if not earlier.

Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives
lockdownsceptics.org ^ | September 20, 2020 | Dr Michael Yeadon

Posted on 3/22/2021, 10:13:02 AM by ransomnote

[stig]

I never said the mRNA integrates into the genome (DNA), nor will I. I've shared this graphic elsewhere wherein the NIH refers to mRNA as gene therapy.

The article and graphic you shared "mRNA: Fulfilling the Promise of Gene Therapy". Is typical of the semantics I see being played. If someone was just scanning your post the take away is mRNA is gene therapy and from the perspective of the general public the take away is "they are playing with my DNA". Without reading the article or studying the graphic (with some underlying knowledge of cellular biology) you would miss the important fact that the mRNA is inserting itself downstream of the typical cellular protein manufacturing process.

On close inspection of the diagram, the mRNA box has a dashed outline indicating this class of therapy skips the first step of DNA transcription into RNA. Further you would need some knowledge of cellular biology to understand that cellular schematic which shows delivery of mRNA into the cytoplasm and that the nucleus of the cell is not involved in the process.

While this is considered "Gene" therapy the "Gene" in this instance of mRNA exists in lab used to manufacture the mRNA. Delivery of the mRNA is only targeted at the cytoplasm. In the nucleus of the cell the enzymes and DNA remain untouched.

For 15 years that RNA vaccine platform has failed to cure HIV, Hep C, and other corona virus types, and it DID kill all the animals in the trials.

Mice and Pigs protamine encapsulated mRNA for rabies (different from lipid nanoparticles) 2016:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918980/
and in human volunteers from 2013 to 2016 reported in 2017 (abstract only):
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28754494/

By 2016 the current lipid nanoparticle technology reported on:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5439223/

2017 used in mice to target melanoma:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5523404/

moderna mRNA influenza vaccine tested in mice, ferrets, monkeys and interim report on human trials 2017:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475249/

Finally animal trials were conducted on the current moderna vaccine reported 2020:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2024671

So there are positive animal trials on mRNA technology. Most recently the study in Macaques. This leads to where we are now with human Phase 1, 2 clinical trials completed on 2 different mRNA vaccines. With both vaccines completing primary endpoint in Phase 3 trials and those trials continuing observation over vaccine recipients.

That's a crucial part in which the companies are lying to the public. They are saying that their products are up to 95% effective. They are intentionally leading the public to think their statement means 95% effective against Covid-19. It does not mean that. The products are actually 95% percent effective in triggering the production of the antibodies specified by the companies.

They calculate 95% based on how many people have confirmed COVID-19, vaccine vs placebo:

Pfizer results:
"8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose were observed among vaccine recipients and 162 among placebo recipients. This case split corresponds to 95.0% vaccine efficacy (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.3 to 97.6; Table 2)"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

Moderna Results:
"Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group (56.5 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 65.3) and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group (3.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0); vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3 to 96.8%; P<0.001)"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389

ERROR CORRECTION to my earlier post 42:
I had said before that cellular effects were local this was incorrect. There is lymphatic spread and distant lymph nodes and the spleen will get a significant dosing of this vaccine. From there it can spread to other organs (likely through the blood) but at a reduced amount. The total dosing received is dependent on the size of the dose of the vaccine. This data is based on trials in mice. This is similar to how other vaccines spread (modified virus type vaccines included).

As a postscript I will add this link to a detailed review of the various types of mRNA technology that is in use or being researched:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2024671

[ransomnote]

According to The Nuremberg Code (1947), “The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

2. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

3. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

4. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

5. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
6. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

7. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment..  

8. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
9. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
10. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

11. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

 

Pasted from <https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/americas-frontline-doctor-simone-gold-warns-of-risks-in-experimental-covid-vaccine-video/>

[ransomnote]

Wow, you provide a quote from the fiction writer ransomnote that contains three falsehoods that you’re including in the smoke you’re blowing. I’ll clear those falsehoods up.

1. The virus causing the DISEASE COVID-19 has been identified and isolated. The name scientists gave given that isolated virus is SARS-CoV-2.

2. Each individual SARS-CoV-2 virus is covered with many identical copies of the virus’ spike protein. It’s that unique spike protein that the mRNA vaccines cause the immune system to produce antibodies for.

3. So, no, the vaccine makers didn’t “chose a spike protein for another type of corona virus”.

Got more smoke to blow?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

---

 According to Moderna, "Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program” or “app” is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.

 

 

mRNA Platform: Enabling Drug Discovery & Development

3/25/2021, 12:21:32 PM · by ransomnote · 4 replies

modernatx.com ^ | 3/25/2020 | MODERNA

---

Note that 'selection of the spike protein' occurs through the manufacturer's selection of the mRNA sequence for their 'vaccine', which for Moderna occurred on the timeline below on January 13, 2020 and was done with the help of Anthony Fauci's division at NIH.

 

---

"Most of the vaccines under development for COVID-19 only show the immune system part of the virus, a protein chosen to prime a strong immune response. (This includes the Pfizer mRNA vaccine.) So, someone who had naturally been infected with the virus might have some additional antibody types not found in someone who had been successfully vaccinated."

Antibodies From Vaccines vs. From Natural Infection (verywellhealth.com)

---

According to the CDC, no isolated samples of the Covid-19 virus exist. The image below cites a July 2020 document but researchers continue to say their requests for isolated samples are denied because they are "unavailable". This limitation harms the race to develop drug treatments, leaving the field open to vaccine makers.

One problem is that the vaccine triggers the production of anti-bodies that are different from the anti-bodies caused by natural Covid-19 infection. This apparently is highy sensitive information that is being scrupulously scrubbed from the internet.

Here's an example of a doctor who died weeks after receiving the 2nd does of the vaccine. He had one type of antibody from the vaccine, and another from the natural Covid infection. I do remember reading about instances where the antibodies developed in response to natural vs vaccine spike protein in the middle of last year, but that kind of lets the cat out of the bag and history is now being rewritten. 

[ransomnote]

The tiny tweak behind COVID-19 vaccines

3/25/2021, 1:29:46 PM · 1 of 1
ransomnote

According to the CDC, no isolated samples of the Covid-19 virus exist. The image below cites a July 2020 document but researchers continue to say their requests for isolated samples are denied because they are "unavailable". This limitation harms the race to develop drug treatments, leaving the field open to vaccine makers.

 

I've been wondering how the vaccine developers are creating their mRNA for Covid-19 if they don't have isolated samples. Perhaps the first sentence of this article answers my question.

"On Jan. 10, Chinese scientists uploaded the genetic sequence of a novel coronavirus, later named SARS-CoV-2, to an open-access website, GenBank."

It looks like China uploaded the  genome to the biowarfare agent they released in order to help us develop a virus to protect ourselves from it. 

Personally I believe that China's biowarfare agent is likely the combination of  both the Covid-19 virus and the vaccines being created based on the genetic sequence they gave us.

Both the SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine mRNA have access to the reverse transcriptase enzyme, both of them can ‘upload’ their genetic sequence to the DNA (Modify the DNA to include their own images).

COVID-19 News: Harvard And MIT Study Alarmingly Shows That SARS-CoV-2 RNA Integrates Into Human Genome With Varying Implications

3/23/2021, 11:02:22 PM · 1 of 2
ransomnote

I think China may have outsourced biowarfare.

[House Atreides]

“According to the CDC, no isolated samples of the Covid-19 virus exist. The image below cites a July 2020 document but researchers continue to say their requests for isolated samples are denied because they are “unavailable”....”
*****************************************************************
The above is NOT TRUE:

The disease named COVID-19 is caused by the virus given the name SARS-CoV-2. And the CDC has, in fact, long since ISOLATED the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the laboratory and routinely makes it readily available for research by the scientific and medical community.

Here is the timeline for those efforts:

1. On January 20, 2020, CDC received a clinical specimen collected from the first reported U.S. patient infected with SARS-CoV-2. CDC immediately placed the specimen into cell culture to grow a sufficient amount of virus for study.

2. On February 2, 2020, CDC generated enough SARS-CoV-2 grown in cell culture to distribute to medical and scientific researchers.

3. On February 4, 2020, CDC shipped SARS-CoV-2 to the BEI Resources Repository.

Here is a link with supporting information on the isolation of the virus that causes COVID-19.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html

[ransomnote]

I Decline To Reply

If you are receiving this post,  it's my personal opinion that, based on my prior experience posting to you, there 's no point in replying to you unless it involves content that I was already interested in posting about.

Reasons you may be receiving this post include, but are not limited to:

Ignoring prior replies as if you've never received a response from me on the same content before. There are people to whom I have spent time composing replies, seeking links to articles, videos, PDF's etc. After I post my response, they continue to  make the same accusations as if they have not been amply refuted.

Pretending you are unaware of obvious information, and instead insisting I spell it out to you with full, defensible rationales and links.

Posting to me with little to no thought /effort and then demanding I reply as long as you continue to post to me, as often as you post to me until your get tired or want to go to lunch.

When refuted, responding by moving the goal posts, shifting the context, playing victim, changing the subject etc.

game playing

Seizing on typos, proof reading errors etc. as reasons to declare my post retuted or debunked

Abusive comments, epithets, profanity

Lying

It's likely some receiving this post will portray it as proof I'm incapable of admitting I'm wrong, providing a valid response, disproving their assertion or supporting my own.  However, my time is not their to direct into futile endeavors. 

Others receiving this post will likely agree that our exchanges are not mutually beneficial, and will gladly move on to post to others.

[bagster]

Look what you did now, Harkonnen.

Shame on you, but hahahaha.

She kicks your ass and walks off.

Like a boss.

[ransomnote]

Jan_Sobieski wrote:
Can you restate how you think vaccine development companies created a vaccine without an isolated virus?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I've wondered how they did it.

As of July 2020 the CDC was saying that the isolate was unavailable. Note that in the first line of my post above, I use the word 'exist' where I should have used 'available'. Elsewhere in the thread post, I confirm I know the Covid-19 existance by saying I think it's a bioweapon and noting the properties it shares with the vacinne mRNA and HIV virus.

I have read/heard physicians and researchers complaints that isolated samples were still unavailable.

I've been trying to figure out how why this could happen. I think the CDC may be 'awarding' samples to favored researchers/organizations.

We know things about the virus, like it has fragments of HIV, and can upload it's sequence into the host's DNA. At the same time, some Dr's and researchers were denied requested samples, and being told none were available. Therefore, I wonder if the doctors/researchers denied samples are calling the CDC's bluff with taunts and digs about the virus not existing with the intention of provoking a release of samples  "Put up, or shut up." 

Lately I'm finding articles saying that the creation of the vaccines spike protein, which is coded by the RNA sequence, is based on China's Covid-19 genome. This means we are 'taking China's word for it' and selecting a sequence of the genome to build our mRNA vaccines. I don't think we have reason to trust China's genome.

Now, in the human trials they say they expose people to the virus but I don't know the method of exposure or if the vaccine companies are being honest (more about that below).

I don't trust the CDC's assertions about the availability of isolates after catching them lying to the nation and harming public health.

I've encountered many accounts of denied requests for it. I know the CDC revises their website freely to alter the narrative so I can't really rely on them as a source. I will need to find sources other than the vaccine companies and the CDC to find out if/when sources of isolated Covid-19 virus are available and what criteria may/may not drive their selection of recipients.

I don't feel bad about not having proof because the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers are definitely lying about so much, they really can't expect me to take their word for it. All negative information about the Covid-19 planned-demic and vaccines is being purged, so we fall back to secondary sources and then those doing the purging ridicule us for relying on secondary sources or struggles to find valid information at all.

The current censorship is removing access to anything but the 'narrative' and the narrative is tragically false (needless shutdown, masks, concealing vaccine risks etc.)

Of greater concern to me is that some of the vaccine trials appear to be faked or modified to prove what they want it to prove, so I am not convinced that they actually exposed people to Covid-19 in the trials yet. 

The vaccine manufactures' designed their human trials to diagnose Covid-19 based on the presence of at lest one Covid-19 related symptom (many are common to other illnesses like the flu) and the PCR test. But the PCR does not indicate the presence of the virus, it indicates the presence of a sequence of molecules found in many different things, like motor oil, fruit, goats etc. Here's a thread that provides the details about the impossible way the vaccine companies manage to get data which supports their products using the PCR, which does not test for the virus, but tests for the matirals from a variety of many different sources.

The logical argument that Fauci, Moderna, Pfizer and others may have fabricated fake Covid-19 vaccine trials and reported falsified data

3/24/2021, 10:34:34 AM · by ransomnote 

 

For just information about the invalidity of the PCR, the article by Dr Mike Yeadon, the former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd., would be faster:

Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives

3/22/2021, 10:13:02 AM · by ransomnote · 

lockdownsceptics.org ^ | September 20, 2020 | Dr Michael Yeadon

 

So Fauci and the vaccine companies agreed to test for the presence of Covid with the PCR, which even the inventor of the PCR, Kary Mullis,  said cannot indicate if someone is ill or not. 

“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to. And they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera,”~ Kary Mullis

 

Pasted from <https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3943889/posts>

 

Inventor of PCR Test Said Fauci 'Doesn't Know Anything' And Is Willing To Lie On Television - National File

 

Twitter Video excerpt: Christopher ✝️ ☂️ on Twitter: "“Dr. Fauci knows nothing.” According to Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR. He sadly died in 2019 in a car crash. So he wasn’t around to call Fauci on his bs. https://t.co/1zC37R2nen" / Twitter

The ramifications of the continuing deception re Covid-19, and the reliance on the PCR (by Fauci, vaccine companies) are tremendously damaging. How am I to trust what these same say about who received what samples, if the samples were the the same Covid-19 identified elsehwere,  or if they tell us they subjected trial participants to the live virus.

The Covid-19 vaccine trials can't be valid based on an invalid test for Covid-19.

Right now, people that I follow have higher credibility than Fauci and the vaccine companies. I am going to try to track down places I previously found complaints that researchers were denied samples and look for updates - because the CDC and Vaccine makers are lying on an epic scale at this point so they aren't a valid source of information.

[ransomnote]

Please download this free PDF and share with your loved ones.

The guide is the professional, comprehensive version of our efforts to share scraps of news about effective Covid treatments wherever we can find it on FR and at home.

Try this no-email-required link instead (ransomnote: I tried the link and it works)

4 posted on 3/25/2021, 11:57:08 PM by Oshkalaboomboom

FREE DOWNLOAD this link requires email address:  A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment - AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (aapsonline.org)

 

Here's the FR thread about this guide:

A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment
aapsonline.org ^ | December 11, 2020 | Association of American Physicians And Surgeons

Posted on 3/25/2021, 11:44:49 PM by ransomnote

 

 

 

 

I found the link to the pDF  by reading an FR thread ( below) and watching the linked video. FReeper SecAmndmt posted testimony by Dr. McCullugh in which he details the way that patients have been denied readily available effective treatment and compassionate care nationwide during the Covid-19 crisis. He talks about effective treatments and the importance of knowing what your options are. 

 

 

Here's the FR thread about his video testimony. Note when you click on the video link, it can be very slow to load and may display a blank page for several seconds.

 

Peter McCullough, MD Testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee
Youtube ^ | March 10, 2021 | Peter McCullough

 

Link to autogenerated video transcript on FR in case it's deleted from YOUTUBE (again)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Try this no-email-required link instead (ransomnote: I tried the link and it works)

[ransomnote]

Please download this free PDF and share with your loved ones.

The guide is the professional, comprehensive version of our efforts to share scraps of news about effective Covid treatments wherever we can find it on FR and at home.

Try this no-email-required link instead (ransomnote: I tried the link and it works)

4 posted on 3/25/2021, 11:57:08 PM by Oshkalaboomboom

FREE DOWNLOAD this link requires email address:  A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment - AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (aapsonline.org)

 

Here's the FR thread about this guide:

A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment
aapsonline.org ^ | December 11, 2020 | Association of American Physicians And Surgeons

Posted on 3/25/2021, 11:44:49 PM by ransomnote

 

 

 

 

I found the link to the pDF  by reading an FR thread ( below) and watching the linked video. FReeper SecAmndmt posted testimony by Dr. McCullugh in which he details the way that patients have been denied readily available effective treatment and compassionate care nationwide during the Covid-19 crisis. He talks about effective treatments and the importance of knowing what your options are. 

 

 

Here's the FR thread about his video testimony. Note when you click on the video link, it can be very slow to load and may display a blank page for several seconds.

 

Peter McCullough, MD Testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee
Youtube ^ | March 10, 2021 | Peter McCullough

 

Link to autogenerated video transcript on FR in case it's deleted from YOUTUBE (again)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Try this no-email-required link instead (ransomnote: I tried the link and it works)

[Bigg Red]

Thank you.

[FreedomPoster]

Ping

[FreedomPoster]

>It’s important to save this information because content on the CDC’s website and other websites is rewritten and removed soon after people start to reference it in debates. I’ve begun to collect and update it in one place.

I want to make sure you and others are fully aware of the primary internet archive sites.

https://archive.org/

https://archive.ph/

Both are worth spending some time on to understand how they work.

Anything important should be saved locally, but creating a record at these sites is quite useful as well.

[FreedomPoster]

Good!

I’ll go ahead and throw my text block on the thread. Most of you have seen it, but hopefully others will see this.

I’ve been pushing Ivermectin here for at least a few months at this point.

IANAD or public health professional, but my understanding is that technically, the vaccines are not “approved”, but rather have “emergency use authorizations.” These EUAs could only be granted if there were no available effective therapeutics. So the FedGov public health establishment had to refuse to recognize the efficacy of HCQ and Ivermectin-based therapies in order to be able to grant those EUAs. By doing this, they greatly increased the death and suffering due to Covid.

If we had a public health edifice that was worth anything, front line health care workers and public-facing store employees would be on Covid prophylaxis, and could have been for months. The Federal public health agencies (FDA/NIH/CDC) have seemingly completely ignored cheap effective re-purposed therapeutics that could have significantly reduced deaths and transmission.

Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19: meta analysis of 35 studies
https://ivmmeta.com/

Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
Key protocols from this group use Ivermectin.

COVID Care for Clinicians
https://www.evms.edu/covid-19/covid_care_for_clinicians/
Ditto this group.

India has been using HCQ and Ivermectin for many months as therapeutics and for prophylaxis. Their curves are quite impressive, scroll down to see them here.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/india/
Anyone able to interpret a basic graph will be impressed. Why is this not being talked about in Western media?

Also from India:
Ziverdo Kit Contains Zinc Acetate 50 mg, Doxycycline 100 mg & Ivermectin 12 mg Dispersible Tablets. It is currently indicated in the first line treatment for COVID-19 positive patients. Quadruple Therapy with Ivermectin is effective in treating COVID-19
https://www.rxindia.com/medicines/medicines-by-therapeutic-class/covid-19/ziverdo-kit/
That’s a link to an Indian online pharmacy selling that Covid treatment kit for under $2, just add vitamin D3.

The Mystery Behind India’s Success in Flattening the Curve
https://covexit.com/the-mystery-behind-india-success-in-flattening-the-curve/
Hint: There are a several hundred million HCQ and Ivermectin tablets as a key component of early therapeutic regimens.

Also, the meta-study link has links to a number of other studies. Here’s the one for HCQ.

HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: real-time meta analysis of 197 studies
https://hcqmeta.com/

The War on ‘Misinformation’ Claims Two Victims. Truth. And the Right to Treatment.
https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/

I continue to think the media, Big Tech and FedGov’s handling of these therapeutics criminal.