The lack of fossil evidence does not prove creation nor does it disprove evolution. It is really hard not to descend to the level of name calling. Whether you believe in creation or evolution is of little consequence. It may not be even a choice. Maybe both are true. It is far more likely that evolution was created than it is that a biblical G dash D created the earth intact 6000 years ago.
N dash t.
According to Darwin, when he first proposed his theory, that actually does disprove it. Now that they've seen that what Darwin expected isn't there, they just say so what?
The basic logical problem with how gradual development of some new feature could possibly propagate through an entire breeding population, long before it actually does anything, has never been answered - except to concoct some new totally unproven stories.
What would or could disprove evolution to the satisfaction of an evolutionist? There is no such thing. Evolution is simply assumed to be the only "scientific" explanation for life forms, meaning that it doesn't matter what the evidence is.