Because the way I see it, there’s simply no reason to believe there was enough fraud to overcome the sad result of a Biden victory.
I eagerly await to hear the early impressions here of that collection of proofs I posted. But please be advised I’m not going to be convinced by any ad hominem.
~~~~~
I almost stopped reading your post at the start because of your conviction that the only resistance to your information will necessarily be baseless emotionalism.
I care nothing for what my reputation or that of FR is if the alternative is to abandon the idea of free elections.
You said: “Because the way I see it, there’s simply no reason to believe there was enough fraud to overcome the sad result of a Biden victory.”
I’m astounded at first by your statement, and then realize it must be that you believe the MSM has been faithfully reporting election results. I’m curious to know how it is you believe Biden didn’t bother to campaign, didn’t advertise campaign stops, said odd things when he did speak, and only attracted 14 persons or under, while at the same time Trump went to countless packed campaign events every day leading up to the election.
If you objectively reviewed campaign efforts, how can you justify the Biden campaigns claim that he received more votes than Obama?
How can you make evidence dissappear? Live taping of campaign results feeds that flip 20,000 out of Trump’s votes which immediately show up in Bidens? Suitcases full of ballots, endless violations of election laws? Shipments from China, ballots on wrong papers, conservative’s ballots printed outside of specs to be rejected etc?
Can it be that you don’t realize that the courts are corrupt but the President pursued every effort to seek justice anyway because the public has to understand that martial law was the only way to restore our election process. With fake elections we become Venezuela.
So the big difference I see between your opinion and mine, is that you are willing to let the MSM inform you of what it decides, wants, accuses etc. and you will ignore your own eyes to comply.
You said: “I eagerly await to hear the early impressions here of that collection of proofs I posted. But please be advised I’m not going to be convinced by any ad hominem.”
My problem with your proposition is that direct evidence is overwhelmingly against you and for anyone to agree with you requires suspension of their own faculties and acceptance of the MSM/Deep State propaganda.
Yo, 47
Here’s a link...Sorry it’s so short (270 pages pdf)...Maybe that could answer some of your questions.
Get back to me when you’ve read it.
I’m astounded at first by your statement, and then realize it must be that you believe the MSM has been faithfully reporting election results.
Again, dear FRiend, you must realize I am not relying on the MSM at all in my OP to this thread. Indeed, my claim(s) rest on the thread from Twitter I posted, a thread that relies on facts alone, not on any MSM interpretation. A thread made by a no-name person, who's identity isn't important (nor his political motivations), because facts are facts. Please, to summarize, you must throw away this apparent reflex of yours that what I said previously is based on some MSM article. It's not. It's based simply on the court cases, and the decisions available to all to see. It has nothing to do with anything anyone from the MSM says, which, I can assure you, I spit upon, I spit upon the MSM for their decades long betrayal of the American citizen for decades.
If you objectively reviewed campaign efforts, how can you justify the Biden campaigns claim that he received more votes than Obama?
Because Trump himself received more votes than Obama. That's the essential thrust of my response to your question. But please allow me to elaborate:
Yes it's true that Biden campaigned very little, while Trump nearly probably killed himself campaigning so much. But that doesn't really prove much because those who attended Trump's rallies (which again of course were substantially more than what attended Biden's) didn't represent a significant portion of any electorate as a whole in any given state. To put in real numbers, say 500,000 attended a Trump rally in any given state (a number vastly more than any reasonable estimate but just for the sake of argument) while only 10 attended a Biden rally. In any of the states in question, there were many more people than 500 thousand, and also, one simply *must* consider that Biden supporters were, for the most part, afraid of COVID infections in large crowds, for whatever reason (right or wrong) it doesn't matter. The numbers at a rally in 2020, given the hype and fear porn surrounding COVID, especially those on the left bought hook line and sinker, don't necessarily prove a lack of enthusiasm for Biden, or more precisely, the level of dislike for Trump.
How can you make evidence dissappear? Live taping of campaign results feeds that flip 20,000 out of Trump’s votes which immediately show up in Bidens? Suitcases full of ballots, endless violations of election laws? Shipments from China, ballots on wrong papers, conservative’s ballots printed outside of specs to be rejected etc?
Can it be that you don’t realize that the courts are corrupt but the President pursued every effort to seek justice anyway because the public has to understand that martial law was the only way to restore our election process. With fake elections we become Venezuela.
With all due respect, all of those objections, at least the vast majority, are addressed and shown conclusively to be false in the Twitter thread I provided, namely and specifically (but not limited to):
"Live taping of campaign results feeds that flip 20,000 out of Trump’s votes which immediately show up in Bidens? "
"endless violations of election laws"
"conservative’s ballots printed outside of specs to be rejected"
and "Can it be that you don’t realize that the courts are corrupt ". (at least half of the court cases documented that thread are decided by Trump appointees, so how far does this "conspiracy" go, until one must ask oneself reasonably, this is just not tenable to believe?)
Consider this fact dear ransomnote (and anyone else reading this with an unbiased mind): Notice the conspicuous absence in that Twitter thread of any court cases (so far) related to the results in Georgia, AND the fact that Trump himself, in the last week or so, hasn't really focused on any court case, hasn't really claimed anything more about any other state other than Georgia, since at the very least Jan 3.
Have you ever asked yourself why he hasn't really done so, at least since Jan 3? Why he only wanted to have a phone call with the Sec of State of GA and no one else? Because he knew that the other court cases were lost, and, perhaps, still believed there was something nefarious to discover in GA but again I submit that given the results in the OTHER states, it's a fantasy to believe anything nefarious happened there, especially since ultimately as I said from the beginning even if there WAS something nefarious there, it WILL NOT CHANGE THE RESULT. TRUMP WILL *NOT* be president Jan 20.
It's sad really, because if there was something nefarious in GA, then it will all be lost, all be swept under the rug, as just another "conspiracy theory" because and precisely because of the results in the other states' court cases. And that is the reason I'm posting now, because any real voter fraud that DID occur (and make no mistake FRiend, I do believe SOME occurred just not enough to overturn the election), if we focus on all of these wacky theories in some desperate, reality denying effort to overturn the election at THIS point, the REAL voter fraud will never be exposed and corrected.
Not to mention again, the incredible damage to conservatism such continues to inflict, if we don't accept reality and move on.
Provided with a proof, Euler’s Totient Function
Video 35m Start at 9m for explanation
GCD Greatest Common Denominator; more times then allowed to be.
Euler proved this in the 18th Century
https://rumble.com/vcj491-unleashing-the-kraken-god-bless-the-republic..html
Violated the Laws of Geometry and Euler’s Theorem Concerning Irreducible Fractions
More on;
Euler’s Totient Function and Euler’s Theorem
https://www.dave4math.com/mathematics/eulers-totient-function/
Can she get an Amen? Yes Ma’am!
Posting blind. I had to take time to make that run to the store today. Drove 30 miles to the closest Walmart, picked up some groceries there. They were sold out of alot of basics like butter and my favorite Tillamook cheeses. I went across the street & completed my list. Saw some other like minded friends doing the same thing.
There is a feeling in the air....
You wasted too much intellect on that one.