Free Republic Browse · Search General/Chat Topics · Post Article

Various Resources | 12-19-2020 | Various Resources

Posted on 12/19/2020 9:12:41 AM PST by Son House

first 1-2021-28 next last
A quick reference for everyone and so this data is all available in one space. I will add some instruction that may be helpful for those who may be seeing this for the first time.

1st instruction.

Explaining the math from using this statement from the affidavit;

‘Each report of votes from a precinct contains a “timestamp”.’

To simplify;

The method “Intended Loser to Total Ratio”

3 results in a precinct, a loser, a winner, and 3pCandidate.

loser is given an exact number, always a constant (KEY)

-then the precinct has a leftover set to assign

winner is given a minimum number,

3pCandidate = 0

the leftover set is split between;

winner is tabulated to beat loser,

3pCandidate gets some of the leftover

so: winner > loser > 3pCandidate

remember, Intended Loser to Total Ratio?

That is what they find in concurrent timestamps, the ratio is transferring.

1 posted on 12/19/2020 9:12:41 AM PST by Son House

To: Son House

2nd instruction

a simple example of something basic, but the big point is they have figured out the pattern and solve for an understanding of an algorithm or two, and what it was doing in the software depending on how the mathematicians solved it that I have been able to follow, there may be more mathematicians and probably is that are working out the data.

to put it in a very simple equation and extrapolate from there;

take

d = a + b + c

d is the summation of adding a, b and c together

but now before you add a, b and c, determine each as they accumulate different counts,

n, m, and l are the votes coming in being summed to the total

like ballots accumulate at a voting machine and now d becomes the outcome of the election

d = (a + l) + (b + m) + (c + n)

next, take

d = (a + l) * k))

the a accumulates as expected but * k means multiply it times a number

d = (9 + 1) * 1 = 10

d = (9 + 1) * 2 = 20

d = (9 + 1) * 3 = 20

so finally to tabulate 3 candidates and produce the outcome

d = (a + l) * i)) + (b + m) * j)) + (c + n) * k)) = result

result print line; a and b and c.

with the multiplier set to 1, each candidate gets the expected count as votes accumulate

but if you wanted to change the just change 1 to a decimal number near that,

say 1.3 or 0.7, then

d = (a + l) * k))

d = (9 votes + 1 vote) * 1.3 = 13

d = (9 votes + 1 vote) * 0.7 = 7

2 posted on 12/19/2020 9:13:11 AM PST by Son House

To: Son House

It is said that where there is smoke there is fire. But unless the responders can actually find the fire, smoke all there is.

3 posted on 12/19/2020 9:19:34 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)

To: Son House

d = (9 + 1) * 1 = 10

d = (9 + 1) * 2 = 20

d = (9 + 1) * 3 = 20

Typo?

4 posted on 12/19/2020 9:23:42 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew (I'd rather have a rude President than a polite tyrant.)

To: Son House

Voter fraud data set PING!

5 posted on 12/19/2020 9:24:35 AM PST by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)

To: Son House
I'd like to see President Dr. Trump do a rally with nothing else but the evidence being spelled out on those beautiful big screens.

The judicial courts are in on the scam, he needs to take his case to the court of public opinion.

6 posted on 12/19/2020 9:26:27 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, demonicRATS would have no standards at all.)

To: Son House

Very well done...thanks!

7 posted on 12/19/2020 9:28:44 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (STOLEN ELECTION 2020)

To: BenLurkin

Is there a math major and/or programmer on site?

8 posted on 12/19/2020 9:29:39 AM PST by Don Corleone (The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)

To: Fester Chugabrew

Excellent! Statistical PROOF OF VOTE MANIPULATION IN BIDEN’S FAVOR and PROOF that machine algorithms were STEALING VOTES FROM OM TRUMP and manipulating VOTE RATIOS.
This PROOF needs to be presented to INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE.

9 posted on 12/19/2020 9:37:13 AM PST by doc maverick

To: Don Corleone
Is there a math major and/or programmer on site?

Yes. What would you like to know?

Everything here makes beyond a reasonable doubt seem like a trivial standard.

ML/NJ

10 posted on 12/19/2020 9:44:52 AM PST by ml/nj

11 posted on 12/19/2020 9:49:24 AM PST by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)

To: BenLurkin

Sad but true. Only counts if:

1. Someone with authority gives a damn.

2. Must have actual PROOF.

12 posted on 12/19/2020 9:52:15 AM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)

To: Don Corleone
Is there a math major and/or programmer on site?

This engineer can tell you that given enough degrees (exponents), he can fit a polynomial to almost anything.

13 posted on 12/19/2020 10:07:36 AM PST by IndispensableDestiny

To: Son House

Son House summary

14 posted on 12/19/2020 11:29:31 AM PST by TNoldman (AN AMERICAN FOR A MUSLIM/BHO FREE AMERICA. (Owner of Stars and Bars Flags))

To: IndispensableDestiny; Son House

“Is there a math major and/or programmer on site?
This engineer can tell you that given enough degrees (exponents), he can fit a polynomial to almost anything.”

This engineer too. Yup, just as you said.

Also, what is the interpretation of a 10 degree polynomial in the problem domain, or is there any such interpretation.

I couldn’t follow the poster wrote, I’ll admit that I didn’t try very hard. I can tell just by looking at the graphs I’ve seen on the net that the election was crooked. But, sad to say, I think the poster’s analysis is probably junk and therefore unhelpful. I’d like to see the opinion of someone with a stat degree.

15 posted on 12/19/2020 12:12:13 PM PST by c-five

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p

16 posted on 12/19/2020 1:24:24 PM PST by bitt (Anton Chekov: “Any idiot can face a crisis; it's this day-to-day living that wears you out.”)

To: c-five

Statistical Evidence of Dominion Election Fraud? Time to Audit the Machines.

Overview
Statistical analysis of past presidential races supports the
view that in 2020, in counties where Dominion Machines were
deployed, the voting outcomes were on average (nationwide)
1.5% higher for Joe Biden and 1.5% lower for Donald Trump
after adjusting for other demographic and past voting preferences.

https://fraudspotters.com/dominion-effect-faq/

17 posted on 12/20/2020 5:28:49 AM PST by Son House

To: Fester Chugabrew
Yes, thanks for catching that, I am obviously not always proofreading.

d = (9 + 1) * 3 = 20 30
18 posted on 12/20/2020 5:33:58 AM PST by Son House

To: Son House

More mathematics analysis;
December 20, 2020

“If we have 213.8 million registered voters in the US and
66.2% of all voters voted in the 2020 election, that equals
141.5 voters who voted in the 2020 election (Binney shows
140 million which is materially the same).

If President Trump won 74 million votes, then that leaves
only 67.5 million votes remaining for Biden. This means 13
million duplicate or made up ballots were created and counted for Biden!”

19 posted on 12/20/2020 7:19:48 AM PST by Son House

To: Son House

Mathematician Interview

Phantom voters exposed: This is how Biden got 13 million extra votes;
https://www.brighteon.com/0acf7fee-a68a-4413-a719-dd0cdbd04bd6

Intro
16:25m Pennsylvania and High frequency trading-vote swap definition

22:00m 220k modifications to the voter files

22:45m Timestamps of digital transactions had to be coded

23:30m Figured out how the technology could be used

23:50m Host summarizes definition of vote swap

25:00m How can they figure that out?

26:50m Early voting

27:50m Updates were probability maps + Host summary

29:30m Paused the vote count

31:15m Reason why they paused the machines - min max range exceeded

37:15m This is all going to be proven

39:30m Explanation of 5 types Phantom voters

20 posted on 12/22/2020 6:48:13 AM PST by Son House