Posted on 12/19/2020 9:12:41 AM PST by Son House
1st instruction.
Explaining the math from using this statement from the affidavit;
‘Each report of votes from a precinct contains a “timestamp”.’
To simplify;
The method “Intended Loser to Total Ratio”
3 results in a precinct, a loser, a winner, and 3pCandidate.
loser is given an exact number, always a constant (KEY)
-then the precinct has a leftover set to assign
winner is given a minimum number,
3pCandidate = 0
the leftover set is split between;
winner is tabulated to beat loser,
3pCandidate gets some of the leftover
so: winner > loser > 3pCandidate
remember, Intended Loser to Total Ratio?
That is what they find in concurrent timestamps, the ratio is transferring.
2nd instruction
a simple example of something basic, but the big point is they have figured out the pattern and solve for an understanding of an algorithm or two, and what it was doing in the software depending on how the mathematicians solved it that I have been able to follow, there may be more mathematicians and probably is that are working out the data.
to put it in a very simple equation and extrapolate from there;
take
d = a + b + c
d is the summation of adding a, b and c together
but now before you add a, b and c, determine each as they accumulate different counts,
n, m, and l are the votes coming in being summed to the total
like ballots accumulate at a voting machine and now d becomes the outcome of the election
d = (a + l) + (b + m) + (c + n)
next, take
d = (a + l) * k))
the a accumulates as expected but * k means multiply it times a number
d = (9 + 1) * 1 = 10
d = (9 + 1) * 2 = 20
d = (9 + 1) * 3 = 20
so finally to tabulate 3 candidates and produce the outcome
d = (a + l) * i)) + (b + m) * j)) + (c + n) * k)) = result
result print line; a and b and c.
with the multiplier set to 1, each candidate gets the expected count as votes accumulate
but if you wanted to change the just change 1 to a decimal number near that,
say 1.3 or 0.7, then
d = (a + l) * k))
d = (9 votes + 1 vote) * 1.3 = 13
d = (9 votes + 1 vote) * 0.7 = 7
It is said that where there is smoke there is fire. But unless the responders can actually find the fire, smoke all there is.
d = (9 + 1) * 1 = 10
d = (9 + 1) * 2 = 20
d = (9 + 1) * 3 = 20
Voter fraud data set PING!
The judicial courts are in on the scam, he needs to take his case to the court of public opinion.
Very well done...thanks!
Is there a math major and/or programmer on site?
Excellent! Statistical PROOF OF VOTE MANIPULATION IN BIDEN’S FAVOR and PROOF that machine algorithms were STEALING VOTES FROM OM TRUMP and manipulating VOTE RATIOS.
This PROOF needs to be presented to INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE.
Yes. What would you like to know?
Everything here makes beyond a reasonable doubt seem like a trivial standard.
ML/NJ
But orange man bad
Sad but true. Only counts if:
1. Someone with authority gives a damn.
2. Must have actual PROOF.
This engineer can tell you that given enough degrees (exponents), he can fit a polynomial to almost anything.
Son House summary
“Is there a math major and/or programmer on site?
This engineer can tell you that given enough degrees (exponents), he can fit a polynomial to almost anything.”
This engineer too. Yup, just as you said.
Also, what is the interpretation of a 10 degree polynomial in the problem domain, or is there any such interpretation.
I couldn’t follow the poster wrote, I’ll admit that I didn’t try very hard. I can tell just by looking at the graphs I’ve seen on the net that the election was crooked. But, sad to say, I think the poster’s analysis is probably junk and therefore unhelpful. I’d like to see the opinion of someone with a stat degree.
p
Statistical Evidence of Dominion Election Fraud? Time to Audit the Machines.
https://fraudspotters.com/statistics-about-dominion-election-fraud/
Overview
Statistical analysis of past presidential races supports the
view that in 2020, in counties where Dominion Machines were
deployed, the voting outcomes were on average (nationwide)
1.5% higher for Joe Biden and 1.5% lower for Donald Trump
after adjusting for other demographic and past voting preferences.
FAQ page about this analysis.
https://fraudspotters.com/dominion-effect-faq/
More mathematics analysis;
December 20, 2020
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-huge-simple-math-shows-biden-claims-13-million-votes-eligible-voters-voted-2020-election/
“If we have 213.8 million registered voters in the US and
66.2% of all voters voted in the 2020 election, that equals
141.5 voters who voted in the 2020 election (Binney shows
140 million which is materially the same).
If President Trump won 74 million votes, then that leaves
only 67.5 million votes remaining for Biden. This means 13
million duplicate or made up ballots were created and counted for Biden!”
Mathematician Interview
Video at link;
Phantom voters exposed: This is how Biden got 13 million extra votes;
https://www.brighteon.com/0acf7fee-a68a-4413-a719-dd0cdbd04bd6
Intro
16:25m Pennsylvania and High frequency trading-vote swap definition
22:00m 220k modifications to the voter files
22:45m Timestamps of digital transactions had to be coded
23:30m Figured out how the technology could be used
23:50m Host summarizes definition of vote swap
25:00m How can they figure that out?
26:50m Early voting
27:50m Updates were probability maps + Host summary
29:30m Paused the vote count
31:15m Reason why they paused the machines - min max range exceeded
37:15m This is all going to be proven
39:30m Explanation of 5 types Phantom voters
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.