[JoSixChip]

It's like they want the system in place to cheat.

[McGavin999]

They do. They are not on the side of the people who pay their salaries.

[Hypo2]

Pass the laws, SCOTUS has no say in state election laws, as they claimed last Friday.

[spetznaz]

Bizzaro world.

[Hypo2]

They can force you to bake a gay wedding cake, outside state discrimination laws, but can not judge on state election law.

[RoseofTexas]

So much for the constitutional Oath crap chit talk... I’m afraid that Trump nominated nothing but a bunch of lying asses! These asses are rapidly becoming a Roberts mirror image! I don’t know why the hell the demoKKKrat were up in arms about these assholes being Nominated and confirmed when they benefit from them more then we do. Ugh!

[Aria]

I don’t recognize this country anymore.

[OneVike]

That’s it
We now have a Banana Republic with a Supreme Court that supports illegals voting so that commies can be elected at will.

Our 2 Nd amendment I will be short lived

And abortion will continue to be the law of the land. We are finished.

[Lod881019]

So much for court packing the court in now 7-2 after these three pieces of work are on it

[PGR88]

I thought States could manage their own election laws?

That’s why the Texas case against PA, WI, MI supposedly had “no standing.”

[Widget Jr]

Being cynical, not being force to be constructionists gives judges unchecked power that they want, that legislatures have a hard time taking back.

[lee martell]

This battle should have been openly fought at least one year ago. Everyone could see the rising tides of illegal voting.

[Secret Agent Man]

Its blatantly obvious the system will not check itself.

When your top court rejects a law that ensures a voter is who theynsay they are in order to improve election validity and reduce potential avenues of fraud and abuse

They are not interested in preserving fair and valid elections anymore

Its time for them all to go, including the new ones that failed this most important question

[Dogbert41]

Soon to be Everytown USA.

[vigilence]

Try getting into the SC audience without IDnyet you can now vote without it. FUBAR!

[Revel]

Lawless Traitors

[Amendment10]

The misguided, institutionally indoctrinated Supreme Court doesn’t seem to understand the following major constitutional problem with allowing non-citizens to vote. The congressional record shows that post-Civil War era lawmakers recognized that states that allow non-citizens to vote effectively nullify the Constitution’s “Establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization Clause (1.8.4).“

• "Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;"

• " If the States can admit to the elective franchise those who are not citizens, thereby neutralizing the votes of citizens, not only the Federal power of naturalization becomes a nullity, but" * * * * "a minority of citizens by the aid of aliens may control the government of the States, and through the States the government of the Union [emphasis added]." —Appendix to the Congressional Globe, 1868. (See near middle of 1st column.)

• " Whatever difference there may be as to what other right appertain to a citizen, all must agree that he has the right to petition and also to claim the Protection of the Government. These belong to him as a member the body politic, and the possession of them is what separates citizens of the lowest condition from aliens and slaves. To suppose that a State can make an alien a citizen or confer on him the right of voting would involve the absurdity of giving him the direct and immediate control of the action of the General Government, from which he can claim no protection and to which he has no right to present a petition [emphasis added]." —Appendix to the Congressional Globe, 1868. (See bottom half of 1st column.)

[Lurkinanloomin]

The Supreme Court is endorsing the non-citizen vote.

They say it’s unconstitutional to uphold the Constitution.