Skip to comments.
Gun Grabbers Demand Unprecedented “Executive Actions”
NRA-ILA ^
| 23 November 2020
| NRA-ILA
Posted on 11/23/2020 11:10:18 AM PST by COBOL2Java
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: COBOL2Java
And “they” would never shop the courts right?
2
posted on
11/23/2020 11:12:22 AM PST
by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: COBOL2Java
And we need to respond like they have for the last 4 years. Tie up every EO in the courts.
3
posted on
11/23/2020 11:15:06 AM PST
by
Kozak
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
To: COBOL2Java
You will NEVER get them. Now go STFU.
4
posted on
11/23/2020 11:15:10 AM PST
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: COBOL2Java
So, by executive fiat, a President can nullify the 2nd amendment. I guess so, because currently we don’t seem to follow that silly Constitution anyway, right?
To: COBOL2Java
Here it comes.
Now all you need is for a President or Gov to declare something is dangerous.
No law, no voting on a law.
It is just deemed dangerous.
6
posted on
11/23/2020 11:17:36 AM PST
by
Zathras
To: COBOL2Java
7
posted on
11/23/2020 11:17:49 AM PST
by
Skywise
To: COBOL2Java
I just got off the phone with my brother and he said he heard on the news (not the entire thing) that gunowners will have 2 choices: sell guns to the government or register the ones they have. He said he didn't get in on the entire segment. I told him that it was probably referring to Biden's intentions.
One thing about it, they're not making any bones about their intentions...on anything.
8
posted on
11/23/2020 11:18:07 AM PST
by
LibertyWoman
(It's NOT over until President Donald J Trump says it is)
To: COBOL2Java
I’m old, tired and pissed off - come and take them, bitches.
9
posted on
11/23/2020 11:19:33 AM PST
by
dainbramaged
(Windage and Elevation)
To: COBOL2Java
It’ll just get shot down in SCOTUS. Why would they even waste their time?
To: Right Brother
So, by executive fiat, a President can nullify the 2nd amendment. I guess so, because currently we don’t seem to follow that silly Constitution anyway, right?
11
posted on
11/23/2020 11:20:21 AM PST
by
COBOL2Java
(Joe Biden: Barack Obama minus the pretty talk.)
To: All
I would like to know how grabbing guns from law abiding citizens will stop “gun violence”...........
12
posted on
11/23/2020 11:20:43 AM PST
by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
To: COBOL2Java
Send more money so Wayne can buy new suits.....
If they do this they will get slammed in 2022 in both the house and the senate.
The left is running around like they just got a new sportscar, but insurance statistics show that is when you are most likely to wreck the car.
They just cannot help themselves.
13
posted on
11/23/2020 11:21:03 AM PST
by
volunbeer
(Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
To: COBOL2Java
Force politics and ‘wag the dog’ BS ain’t gonna fly!
14
posted on
11/23/2020 11:21:55 AM PST
by
SMARTY
("It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." Twain)
To: Zathras
When enough people in a population withdraw consent the government and its law become illegitimate.
15
posted on
11/23/2020 11:26:53 AM PST
by
mrmeyer
(You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
To: COBOL2Java
Because prohibition worked so well in the 1920’s and 30’s.
16
posted on
11/23/2020 11:28:25 AM PST
by
Roman_War_Criminal
(Jesus + Something = Nothing ; Jesus + Nothing = Everything )
To: COBOL2Java
Ya...I remember the movie “Executive Action”.
17
posted on
11/23/2020 11:30:26 AM PST
by
G Larry
(There is no merit in compromising with the Devil.)
To: COBOL2Java
When the confiscaters are staring down the business end of my ____ they will know what the law is.
18
posted on
11/23/2020 11:35:20 AM PST
by
exnavy
(american by birth and choice, I love this country!)
To: COBOL2Java
Most of what Biden has up on his website requires legislation. The NFA and 1968 Act are quite clear in their definitions of what's covered. So clear in fact that an AR lower is no longer considered a firearm by some circuit courts, because it doesn't meet the statutory definition.
Good luck trying to get all semi-automatics classified as NFA items.
Similarly with requiring an FFL for any transfer: you have to be in the "business" of selling firearms, which would mean it must be above the "hobby" level as the IRS classifies it.
The biggest direct threat is if they tried to pull an FFL holder's license if he didn't treat an "assault weapon" as an NFA item, but even that I think would be dispensed with in the courts fairly quickly.
19
posted on
11/23/2020 11:36:46 AM PST
by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
To: LibertyWoman
There are a lot more than two choices, none of which are nice.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson