Maybe not ?
The problem with questions, is that once asked, they don’t just go away ? Most journalism is eminently forgettable, but if it addresses burning issues of the day with questions that need answering, and there are no answers ?
What is journalism ?
Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Who cares?
Socrates knew questions are not statements of fact ?
Why don’t journalists ask real questions, today, instead of making statements ?
Read everything... with an eye cocked to look for the questions that aren’t asked, much less answered, and what will you find ?
And, when you ask those questions others have intentionally not asked... what will be the impact ?
A quick comment on the PA response.
It doesn’t appear to address the issues raised in the TX filing.
It appears it responds to what they thought the TX filing would be, rather than what it is, while they try hard to mischaracterize the filing as if it were what they want it to be, and not what it is.
Apparently, Sidney pounding fraud... has them responding to claims of “fraud” in their reply to the TX suit, when the TX suit doesn’t ever address it.
They rail against Texas for asking the court to make Trump president... and ask the court to not do that... when the TX filing is as clear as it can be, and deliberately makes it plain, that they are NOT asking for that.
Either the lawyers are morons... or they think pretending to not understand the TX arguments... will confuse the Justices into not understanding them, or allow them to pretend they don’t ?
Its truly embarrassing. Can’t recall having seen anything worse, ever, presented at this level.
It makes it VERY clear they were not prepared to be called on to respond to the arguments TX made, or to rebut the remedies asked.
On the face of it, if it is decided on the “merits” presented today... I’d give TX the win.