Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lower55
It's a silly and losing argument..........Kamala Harris is eligible to run for the presidency. This has been debated ad nauseum on this site since Obama first ran.............Sheesh!

And that's all I'm going to say about this idiocy.........

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

14 posted on 08/13/2020 1:53:14 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hot Tabasco
It's a silly and losing argument...
Thanks for sharing your opinion.
If one were to follow your reasoning then opposing the riots going on is a silly and losing argument as well.
Both views demand that the rule of law be ignored.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162
Ex Parte Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116 (1894)

16 posted on 08/13/2020 2:16:18 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson