To: bagster
Suppose Sullivan knew there were ongoing investigations and thus the exculpatory (???) evidence was being used for said investigations and thus could not be made public. I don’t know nuttin.
367 posted on
04/29/2020 6:48:21 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
To: little jeremiah
Suppose Sullivan knew there were ongoing investigations and thus the exculpatory (???) evidence was being used for said investigations and thus could not be made public. If he knew about the exculpatory evidence, as your hypothesis presumes, he could have seen it without making it public. Happens all the time.
Motion denied.
373 posted on
04/29/2020 7:01:49 PM PDT by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: little jeremiah
If Sullivan just initially threw out the Flynn case would any of this incriminating evidence ever have been seen? I doubt it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson