OK, so if you don’t like the jury system, what’s your idea for how to determine someone’s guilt or innocence?
Its become a sham. More swamp. Lawyers want to win regardless of the facts. OJ had his dream team. He got away with murder. (Then was convicted of protecting his property....but that is a bastardization of Justice) Those innocent of the same crime rot in jail. Whatever happened to a constitutionally protected speedy trial. So much wrong out there.
I agree with our legal system rules as written by the founding fathers. That however is not the current paradigm.