Posted on 11/30/2019 12:04:17 PM PST by ransomnote
Lrn 2 read.
Publik skool made me smart.
Seems you were saying the enabling rule applied to citizens and the agency, when it reads clearly that this rule applies to the agency. It applies to the agency, an agency that should be limited by the constitution. It is not a rule that is aimed at limiting citizen rights.
If you disagree, I was wondering why you didn’t raise your objection or concerns to the Agency when it was out for public comment. I did, called people I know in DOJ and asked them a few questions. It’s an awful rule and I told them that.
I may be smart (being educated in public schools), I saw no snark aimed at you. That confuses. Just because someone has a different opinion does not mean they are your enemy and should be a target of your snark.
Cheers!
FRiend, I wasn’t trying to piss you off.
I simply didn’t say any such thing.
My initial post on the topic stated that the rule could not be reconciled with the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution, and went on to include the text of that amendment.
Anyway, you’re free to believe as you wish about what I mean, or how I intended my replies; after all, I’m just words on a screen.
No harm. Cheers
Exactly! I was pulled over because the car was registered to a owner of a suspend license. No traffic infractions. Just because the car was registered to a person with a suspended liscense. Both leo had no idea who was driving a properly register and insured car. If you’re cool with that, that’s your thing. I thought it was intrusive.
Mind you, both times I was not cited.
They don’t know who’s driving the car, and I dont think I should be pulled over for the sake of check. The car is legal and I didn’t commit any reason to be pulled over.
I don’t object to reasonable searches but strongly object to unreasonable ones. The technology you’ve described has been in use for decades by manned craft. I simply don’t see the difference if a man is sitting in a craft, using this technology or if someone is viewing the same data from a remote location using an unmanned craft. FYI, I’m not up to anything. I just want to make sure that law enforcement has the tools necessary to catch bad guys, like illegals crossing the border or drug smugglers and human traffickers.
Won’t get used to track illegals, that’s not what most of Washington wants.
They want to trample our rights.
“He probably has system in his vehicle that is scanning everybody’s license plate and bumping them against a database.”
I believe that is all done hands free - by the computer.
Law enforcement uses that type of technology To go after criminals but as far as Washington goes, they seem to misuse a lot of things. I think we’ve seen that the fact that no policy exists regarding surveillance hasn’t stopped them yet. It only hampers the good guys.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.