[Morgana]

I'm going to say it, I'm going to say it.. Bill I figured you picked her for that and only that, she does not look like the kind a man sticks cigars into.

[irishjuggler]

I was one of the first pro-choice Democrats to run since Roe v. Wade, who actually benefited from Roe v. Wade.

Benefited from Roe? What is he saying? Is he saying that he was the first Dem nominee to have procured a legal abortion? If so, well, yes, that seems probably true. Thinking about the other guys... Jimmy Carter, Fritz Mondale, Dukakis... very possible, even probable, that none of those guys ever knocked up some gal on the side.

[Mark17]

I'm going to say it, I'm going to say it.. Bill I figured you picked her for that and only that, she does not look like the kind a man sticks cigars into.

Ouch, that’s going to leave a scar. 😁

[lee martell]

Ms Morgana, this is the first time you have made me laugh out loud. That last remark about Judge Ruth did me in!!
The best jokes usually contain a large amount of truth.

[Secret Agent Man]

Impeach and remove Ginsburg.

[sport]

I will be glad when Bill and Hillary depart this World.

[boatbums]

I wonder how many people know that Ruth Bader Ginsberg was critical of the Roe vs. Wade decision? A number of years ago, she had this to say about it:

Those more acquainted with Ginsburg and her thoughtful, nuanced approach to difficult legal questions were not surprised, however, to hear her say just the opposite, that Roe was a faulty decision. For Ginsburg, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision that affirmed a woman’s right to an abortion was too far-reaching and too sweeping, and it gave anti-abortion rights activists a very tangible target to rally against in the four decades since.

Ginsburg and Professor Geoffrey Stone, a longtime scholar of reproductive rights and constitutional law, spoke for 90 minutes before a capacity crowd in the Law School auditorium on May 11 on “Roe v. Wade at 40.”

“My criticism of Roe is that it seemed to have stopped the momentum on the side of change,” Ginsburg said. She would’ve preferred that abortion rights be secured more gradually, in a process that included state legislatures and the courts, she added. Ginsburg also was troubled that the focus on Roe was on a right to privacy, rather than women’s rights. “Roe isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” Ginsburg said. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice…it wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.”https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-offers-critique-roe-v-wade-during-law-school-visit

I think it's obvious today that the SCOTUS decision which overruled EVERY state's rights on the issue was actually UN-constitutional. That many states today are reasserting their rights even under Roe to limit or outlaw abortion are evidence that Ginsberg's preference to have left the matter to individual states legislatures was just as wrong-headed as her opinions defending it. Her point that wealthy women would always find a way to obtain abortions, though true, misses the fact that more and more people are abhorrent of the practice as we gain information about fetal development and advances in neonatology mean younger and younger babies survive premature birth.

I pray I live to see the day that abortion won't have to be made illegal because it will be unthinkable.

[jacknhoo]

Demonic is as demonic does. And it ain’t over yet.

[Texas Eagle]

I'm going to say it, I'm going to say it.. Bill I figured you picked her for that and only that, she does not look like the kind a man sticks cigars into.

Ha haaaaa! I'm not so sure about that. Remember that 3,000 year old mummy he had the hots for?

[Texas Eagle]

Well, okay. I guess that opens the door for President Trump to ask Ginsberg’s replacement the same question. HA! Riiiight.

[Liz]

Remember when the "kindly, compassionate" Clintons (Bill was then-President)
assured America that abortion would be "safe, legal and rare?" Remember that?

============================================

Oops. The kindly Clintons plumb "forgot" to mention that they
themselves opened the gates so that Planned Parenthood could traffic
(and profit) in baby body parts.

(EXCERPT--WND.COM). Then-Pres Clinton is credited w/ opening up the market in fetal body parts. Since Clinton signed the National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993, “fetal-tissue research” has expanded into a federally subsidized multi-million dollar industry of selling human spare parts salvaged from abortions.

For example, the NIH budgeted $21 million in fiscal year 1999 for grants and awards for fetal tissue research. At the University of Washington, the NIH subsidizes the central laboratory for human embryology.

According to a lab notice obtained by WorldNetDaily, it “can supply tissue from normal or abnormal embryos and fetuses of desired gestational ages between 40 days to term. Specimens are obtained within minutes of passage, and tissues are aseptically identified, staged, and immediately processed according to the requirements of individual investigators.” The notice is signed by Alan G. Fantel of the department of pediatrics.

At the time, two organizations that profited from this growth industry were (the now defunct) Opening Lines, a business formerly located in West Frankfort, Illinois...... and Anatomic Gift Foundation, headquartered in Laurel, Maryland.

Opening Lines publicly gave credit to President Clinton for opening up the lucrative business in fetal tissue trade. According to Opening Lines, on January 22, 1993 (the infamous anniversary of legalized abortion---Clinton is not without an in-your-face governing style), Clinton lifted the moratorium on federal funding. “This action created a great demand for fetal tissue and has made possible the development of treatments for individuals afflicted with serious diseases and disorders,” says the Opening Lines sales brochure.

Both companies served as wholesalers for the marketing of baby body parts to researchers, drug companies, hospitals and universities. These groups harvest the baby parts from abortion clinics and ship them to their customers.

Opening Lines provides fetal tissue researchers with a “fee for service schedule,” which gives prices for each body part. For example, Opening Lines charged:

<><> $150 for a spinal column;

<><> $400 for an intact embryonic cadaver;

<><>$75 for 8-week-old baby's eyeballs (40% discount for a single eye);

<><>$150 for two arms or legs; and,

<><> $100 for the skin of a 12-week-old baby.

[Ann Archy]

He LIES!! He picked her because her Husband Gave the Clinton Library or Foundation a TON of MONEY!!

[captmar-vell]

Bill and Hillary have served their god well, Moloch

[DoodleDawg]

Big freakin’ surprise. Trump chose Gorsuch and Kavanaugh in no small part because of their opposition to abortion.

[liberalh8ter]

RBG should immediately be removed because the left says men are not allowed to to speak about or have an opinion about abortion. #Rules