Posted on 09/20/2019 9:11:10 AM PDT by conservative98
OPINION Devine: Elizabeth Warren’s war on men is an insulting, losing strategy By Miranda Devine
September 18, 2019 | 10:35pm
Elizabeth Warren Elizabeth Warren Barcroft Media via Getty Images Elizabeth Warren made the political calculation this week that she doesn’t need men to win the presidency.
“We’re not here today because of famous arches or famous men,” she told a rally in Washington Square Park Monday night.
“In fact, we’re not here because of men at all,” she said, emphasizing the “m” word like an expletive.
Great. Then she won’t mind if men don’t vote for her, nor women who like men.
It’s a losing strategy, taken straight out of the playbook of Hillary Clinton, from whom, reportedly and inexplicably, Warren has been taking advice.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
If in any type of crisis situation women and minorities are always hardest hit, doesn’t that imply they need white men to fix it for them?
She showed great disrespect for her father with that bitchy remark. Perhaps she doesn’t know that it takes sperm to create life.
The National Scold is taking advice from America’s Ex-Wife.
Fauxcahontas needs to be called out for her war on men. I just want to hear her pivot and try to prove she’s not a man-hater. It will certainly bug her feminist supporters if she starts saying complimentary things about men.
“Girl power”. Oy. They’re both very odd.
Men do not tend to like bitchy harpies so I dont see it slowing her vote much.
And that was the last anyone heard of The Dixie Chicks.
Lesson: If you want people to support you, try not to insult them.
Probably smells like a hamster cage being around those two..
Mothers of sons are not amused
7.4 billion people alive, and not a one of them, male and female alike, would exist except for DNA provided by a male parent. Maybe Liz Warren is unaware of that.
Without men creating civilization she would still be dragged through caves by her hair—and would be begging to eat whatever scraps they chose to feed her.
I expect they’ll try to remove voting rights from men, as reparations for women not having the vote before 18 August 1920.
She is a dim bulb.
She's an affirmative-action hire, even though she's as white as wonder bread.
Speaking of reparations for not being able to do something, I deserve reparations to compensate for the girls in high school that wouldn’t put out. It being the 60s, that was pretty much all of them hahaha
No money required, I will take my reparations in kind LOL
Medicare for all and Nazi Health insurance force people to use expensive “cures” that are provided for them. What is needed is low cost options, one of them being the freedom to choose no insurance at all.
This is 1970's liberation cant spewed by creaky, wrinkled 1970's politicians, and it shows, it's as dated as they are. With incredibly rare exceptions we all have a daddy and a mommy, and we're all in this together.
But don’t say Warren doesn’t do anything at all for men... Her latest policy on reproductive rights ensures that all men have access to taxpayer-funded abortions.
Well, she's got me there all right...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.