Capital Murder is a state crime and in this case the people of El Paso County can put him and trial and convict him.
Maybe then they'll stop all these false flags.
Here’s a better one. When the person is caught in the act and alive, televised hanging in 48 hours....right before the lotto numbers are announced.
Swift trial and public hanging after conviction and a super-expedited appeals process.
Shoot them on the spot.
No need for a trial.
People who want to change our laws are not, by definition, conservative.
Our laws already say how to handle criminals. Let’s use it.
I think you're barking up the wrong tree. Your basic premise is flawed because these mass shootings are not federal crimes.
Capital murder is a state's crime, not a federal one.
These types of crimes are prosecuted in the states in the jurisdiction where they occurred, not in the federal courts.
Judicial punishment is not a deterrent to these crimes. If you want to mandate the death penalty for these acts, that’s great, you have my support. Will do nothing for prevention.
Too much time..
The person who assassinated Pres. McKinley was prosecuted, found guilty - and an execution carried out - in about 90 days.
3 months should be sufficient. AND - the law needs to block courts from considering how the poor little murderer might have been mistreated as a child, or was bullied one time too many. Courts need to be blocked from pretending that ‘capital punishment’ is not Constitutional - when it is directly mentioned in the Constitution.
Mandatory organ donor. At least something good could come out of the act.
“And then one and only one appeal directly to the US Supreme Court that is automatically moved to the top of the docket. The ruling on appeal must be issued within three months.”
See here’s the problem! You are asking the Nine Black Robed Pukes to actually work! That is antithetical to their “lofty position.” We have allowed them to be a bunch of layabouts, contemplating their navels while trying to deduce how many angels can dance on the head of a pin! Sorry, but you could put nine common sense people picked out of the phone book and get better outcomes. I mean who needs to write volumes about every f*cking thing they touch? In many respects, they are much worse than the Congress because you have to wait around decades for them to die. Time to go Ruthie, and take Breyer with you!
Start prosecuting the shrinks who put them on meds. Virtually every shooter is on meds. Its simple.
Trial within one, not six months.
They'll spend MILLIONS of taxpayer dollars and YEARS to "prove" that the Sun rose in the East, yet again.
We got witnesses, video, law enforcement taking him down with weapons in hand.
Eff you and your "common sense", peasant.
With an emphasis on "public".
Deterrence does not apply to the insane.
The answer is to plant into the minds of the crazies not a fear of being caught but rather a fear that it won't work and they won't get to kill a bunch of people AND they will end up in prison. If the crazies are convinced they will be stopped in the act, they won't try it to begin with.
I wrote what I truly believe is the answer to stopping the mass shooting problem in another thread. It will work.
An armed citizen close enough to see them in the act and then shoot them in the head would be great.
Saves a lot of fuss and taxpayer dollars.
Assuming they are meant to deter others from committing mass shootings, the measures you posit are virtually usless since very few of these criminals are taken alive.
Unconstitutional.
And most of them do us the favor of killing themselves.