52 is a good argument... same equation... written differently, how do you explain the answer?
52 implies a second set of () or []. In other words, the equation in 52 would be written 8/[2(2+2)] or 8/(2(2+2)).
As I point out in post 42, the problem is poorly written. It is akin to how you would pronounce POLISH.
I think we both mean post 53, lol.
Fyi, the poster on 53 has a different answer on 61