I think a lot of us here don’t really understand Net Neutrality, other than the fact that it was DEMOCRATS demanding it - so it had to be bad for both the country and for freedom.
Now we hear of a guy going to jail for a felony over it - makes me wonder more, just what the hell they were going to with Net Neutrality.
I am not a super guru on it, but I think the way things work without it is that content providers can pay more to make their content faster. Notice their competitors will not be slower, they just won't as fast as those who are willing to pay.
With it everyone is the same speed.
I don't understand people getting all worked up over someone paying for an advantage...