I had a thought today ... I don’t think people will go this far ... but work with me lol:
There was this letter from ]SESSIONS[ that came out with e-mail from Whitaker last Friday night as I recall. Lib blogger type that somehow was apparently tipped at the time it was sent filed FOIA that same day. Then, just a week ago, as Whitaker left the building, voila! It was sent on over. DS media was outraged to learn that ]SESSIONS[ had tasked HUBER with CF + HRC e-mails, etc..
There were a couple words or clauses in the letter or e-mail that caught my eye this time.
One was that Whitaker / ]SESSIONS[ said something like ... you (HUBER) don’t have to look at anything that the Mule is already doing.
I’ve seen tangential stuff along the way here that suggests that the D_J is running like the Mule org (vs. op) represents some SIGNIFICANT portion of D_J business these days - like it’s the primary game in town. This has struck me that there’s more going on here than meets the eye and thus I flip & flop over [RR] & the Mule, etc..
I inferred from this e-mail / letter dump that HUBER wasn’t precluded from looking things under Mule jurisdiction.
BUT what if HUBER is providing some additional redirection that shields the Mule is doing things supposedly tasked to HUBER but ... and this necessitates the Mule & [RR] be more than leveraged IMO - the Mule is doing stuff that would not only substantiate the “ultimate reveal” I have in my wildest conceptualizations ... but kinda include something like a con within a con within a con ... so intertwined & obscured, there is practically NOBODY who really knows.
Whatever ... this is going to be glorious!
HEAD’S UP: Hannity is replaying on FNC now if (like me) you mist the first time around except for the web links above :)
Brian Cates has noticed a change on twitter. He tweets:
Well something’s different today. I haven’t tweeted in over 7 hours and my Twitter activity level is still over 1,000,000.
Usually it’d have dropped to around 700,000 by now.