Posted on 02/23/2019 4:49:34 PM PST by pcottraux
The Truth About Galileo
By Philip Cottraux
Galileo. His name invokes the image of a brave scientist standing up against religious authority. The story goes that he discovered the earth is revolving around the sun, proving we are not the center of the universe. The Catholic church, threatened by this, had him arrested and burned at the stake until he recanted his findings. Galileo is remembered as some sort of atheist folk hero, suffering the consequences for his heroic stance against superstition.
This is the version most people learn in school. I remember it from high school world history class. Galileo has become a go-to accusation against Christianity, as if his findings represent the first step in the inevitable demise of religion. But like many atheist rewrites of history, this is largely a myth.
Galileo Galilei was born in Italy in 1564. The part of the story most atheists leave out is that the brilliant astronomer was a devout Catholic his entire life. In 1608, word got out of Hans Lippershey’s invention of the telescope in the Netherlands, opening up a never-before seen window to the heavens. Not content to repeat Lippershey’s results, Galileo invented his own more advanced telescope.
To say that Galileo’s subsequent discoveries weren’t revolutionary would be wrong. For centuries, mankind believed that the celestial bodies were perfect, governed by different physical laws than Earth. Galileo was the first to observe sunspots (Isaac Newton would take this further, proposing that the law of gravity is universal). But perhaps more significantly, he found four moons orbiting Jupiter (we now know Jupiter actually has sixty moons), and proposed that Earth itself is logically revolving around the sun, not the other way around.
This idea wasn’t really new. In 1543, Nicolaus Copernicus proposed a similar heliocentric model. Galileo only proved it. There is some atheist lore about Copernicus also being a “martyr for science,” but this is even less credible. Copernicus was also a devout Catholic and his proposal was hardly controversial; in fact, the church barely noticed it. Since he died of natural causes the same year his theory was published, there is obviously no evidence of any persecution.
So why was Galileo’s discovery so upsetting? According to the atheists: “Because Christianity is superstitious and religion=bad, ha ha.” But there’s far more to the story that needs to be unpacked. The first problem for Galileo was that his findings couldn’t have come at a worse time because of a recent seismic change: the Reformation. Protestants felt a heliocentric model contradicted the following Bible verses:
-Psalm 93:1: The Lord reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the Lord is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is established, that it cannot be moved.
-Psalm 104:5: Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed forever.
-Ecclesiastes 1:5: The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose.
Since these scriptures are in poetic books, Christians today have no trouble interpreting them as mere expressions by ancient people with limited knowledge of the cosmos. But in Galileo’s time, the Catholic church was on edge about losing members, and there was a great fear that his findings would cause more defections.
The other question that needs addressing is why the church believed in an earth-centric solar system in the first place; and it’s not because of the preceding Bible verses. The back-story is even more complicated. While atheists laugh at Medieval Christianity for believing the sun revolves around the earth, they ignore that this came from the influence of the Greek philosopher Aristotle.
Aristotle is one of history’s greatest thinkers; his contributions to scientific philosophy are immeasurable. He also more or less created the field of biology; his rigorous classification of organisms was so ahead of its time, it’s still in use 2,300 years later. Aristotelian theory was incorporated into Christianity by Thomas Aquinas, another of history’s great theologians, in thirteenth century.
However, most of Aristotle’s astronomical ideas haven’t held up as well. He thought the celestial bodies were perfect, revolved around the earth, and were governed by separate laws of physics. One has to take into consideration that ancient Greece was limited in its observations of the heavens. Pragmatically accepting new findings and unemotional abandoning disproved ideas is crucial to scientific philosophy. This approach makes science constantly self-correcting, leading to the wonders it has given us for the past millennia. Sadly, Aristotle himself would have likely been thrilled at Galileo’s discovery and would want the world to abandon his astronomical model in favor of it. To label new evidence heresy was completely missing the point.
Even still, Galileo wasn’t denounced initially, but met with mixed reactions. Jesuit astronomers accepted the heliocentric model. But the next problem on Galileo’s were enemies in the church with a vested interest in his downfall now had the perfect opportunity to strike. Chief among these was Father Caccini, who publicly insisted “Geometry is of the devil and mathematicians should be banished as the authors of all heresies.” Interestingly enough, while the charge of “atheistic discoveries” would come later, at first Galileo was accused of witchcraft.
Despite the controversy, the church allowed Galileo to publish his findings as long as he presented a balanced approach. His book, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, was framed as a dialogue between a geocentrist and heliocentrist, moderated by an impartial narrator. But the author’s bias was obvious, to say the least. The book just added fuel to the fire.
In 1633, Galileo was tried before the Roman Inquisition. He was ordered to “abjure, curse, and detest” his life’s work. His publications were banned and he was placed under house arrest. While this is certainly unfortunate, the degree to which he was persecuted has been largely exaggerated over the years. He was paid full pension and the story of him being burned at the stake until he renounced his views is pure fiction (this was actually the fate of Giordano Bruno in 1600 for teaching pantheism).
The long-term effect on humanity is also misrepresented; the traditional claim is that egomaniacal mankind thought the universal revolved around us until science said otherwise. But while the sun revolving around the earth seems to have been common, typically Christians viewed God at the top of the universe and the world being just above hell at the bottom. Earth was viewed as a sort of cosmic dumpster. Far from “putting man in his place” Galileo demonstrated that the celestial bodies are imperfect, and finding our place in the solar system actually elevated mankind to a higher state.
Ultimately, Christianity was not harmed by Galileo. Like most scientific discoveries, the church overall adapted and survived. Other than some fringe groups (such as the appalling recent flat-earth movement), few are left who question the scientific consensus of the earth’s tiny but special place in the universe. Sadly, because of historical misconceptions and downright lies about cases like Galileo, the battle lines have been drawn now more than ever. Religion should not be afraid of science, or vice versa nor science religion. The two coexisting in harmony will make a better world for us all.
-Manschreck, Clyde. A History of Christianity in the World. Second Edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood, NJ, 1985, pages 133, 205.
-Strobel, Lee. The Case for a Creator. Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI, 2006, pages 162-163.
-Collins, Francis. The Language of God. Free Press, New York, NY, 2006, pages 153-156.
****
Whenever I post a blog on scientific history, some smart-aleck always corrects me on one little detail I got wrong. Oh well...this week I'm prepared for it!
*****
You can also subscribe by entering your email in the subscription box on the home page, read all my past blogs on the Archives page, or follow me on:
Twitter: @DepthsPentecost
YouTube: Depths of Pentecost
Thanks for reading/watching, and God bless!
This is the official ping list for Depths of Pentecost: I’m a Christian blogger who writes weekly Bible lessons. Topics range from Bible studies, apologetics, theology, history, and occasionally current events. Every now and then I upload sermons or classes onto YouTube.
Let me know if you’d like to added to the Depths of Pentecost ping list. New posts are up every Saturday, videos every Wednesday.
I understood that he was a poor boy from a poor family.
This should probably be in Religion. But thank God you’re here to explain to all of us how wrong history is.
“In 1633, Galileo was tried before the Roman Inquisition. He was ordered to “abjure, curse, and detest” his life’s work. His publications were banned and he was placed under house arrest. While this is certainly unfortunate”
Unfortunate? Baloney.. The idea of a church, conducting a trail and placing him under house arrest is what people are generally disgusted by.
There are all kinds of games to evade responsibility, but yes, the Church was despotic at that time. Bur it was hundreds of years ago, so it is the worst kind of apologetics to “unpack” it and pretend that it really wasn’t that bad.
If Galileo would have had a Glock, he would have been fully justified in producing it and shooting his way out of the room.
Don’t start doing the Fandango, for pity’s sake.
Mama mia, Mama mia...
Huzzah!
Oh mama mia, mama mia, mama mia let me go
Beelzebub has a devil put aside for me for me for me
Galileo was a brilliant man. He would never have cheapened a discussion by using "unpack" in a rhetorical context.
Galileo was a back-stabbing asshole who got what he deserved.
If he'd been ordered to "unpack" his life's work, he'd have been justified in nuking the place.
Some Smart Aleck,
Spelling Cop or
Punctuation Police.
.
Ya done good,FRiend!
OK. I put your quote in DuckDuckGo. It brought me to FreeRepublic.
There is no biblical or Christ based defense of what they did to him ***400 years ago!*** Better that they should just own it and emphatically say today’s Roman church wouldn’t do that. I see no need to apologize, though JPII already basically did. Galileo is long gone, and so are the thugs who tried him.
Then I would point out Georges Lemaitre, a Belgian Priest who was responsible for the big bang theory. I would direct further inquiries to the Vatican observatory in Arizona.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_Advanced_Technology_Telescope
The modern Roman church’s actual activity regarding science today is the best apology Galileo would have ever asked for. That mean’s far more than some farcical apology. I’d bet a paycheck on it.
No one tried to claim that Gallileo was an atheist when I was in school. As a matter of fact, I’ve never heard anyone try to characterize him as such, much less that he is some icon for atheism. Sounds like a straw man.
Aw geez! I totally missed the reference until I saw the replies, LOL!!
Ashes can't recant.
He died of natural causes. He wasn’t burned at the stake.
The biblical roots of Galileo's name and surname were to become the subject of a famous pun.[27] In 1614, during the Galileo affair, one of Galileo's opponents, the Dominican priest Tommaso Caccini, delivered against Galileo a controversial and influential sermon. In it he made a point of quoting Acts 1:11, "Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven?". Wiki
Galilee is "galil", the Hebrew word for a cylinder. The root is all about revelation (unrolling) and rolling, circular motion and so forth.
Galileo was famous for his cylinder:
Galileo noted that the revolution of the satellites of Jupiter, the phases of Venus, rotation of the Sun and the tilted path its spots followed for part of the year pointed to the validity of the sun-centered Copernican system over other Earth-centered systems such as the one proposed by Ptolemy. Galileo's instrument was the first to be given the name "telescope". Wiki
Galileo was born in Pisa, the town whose symbol is the leaning cylinder.
Divine order of the universe:
"How if I just leave this here."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.