She knows enough to know her right not to answer questions, and knows enough to know what to do when she is not under arrest.
I saw that. I watched the video.
“Am I under arrest?”
Agent: “No.”
~~SLAM~~
“She knows enough to know her right not to answer questions, and knows enough to know what to do when she is not under arrest.”
Funny how she can make these statements about shooting the President, refuse to speak to the Secret Service, and nothing happens; but, General Flynn agrees to speak to federal agents, without the legal representation that he is led to believe he doesn’t need, and he gets indicted. There’s a lesson here.
Blue House Sue wrote:
She knows enough to know her right not to answer questions, and knows enough to know what to do when she is not under arrest.
But not enough to know that making a threat online is a crime. And will be investigated.
Thanks for the sane response, Blue House Sue.
Just because they are on the opposite side doesn’t mean they don’t have rights...whether we like it or not.