Click the pic to hear him say it to Judge Jeanine.
Posted on 01/13/2019 12:06:32 AM PST by CptnObvious
Rather than deal with Illegal immigrant wave number 2, the Democrats on the Hill engage in wet dreams and socialism.
A 70% tax rate?? This is the proposal that will bring in American votes - Yeah Right.
Government run healthcare "Medicare for all". Yeah Obamacare skyrocketed premiums. So instead lets Tax them to a literal death with European style healthcare.
Abolish the Electoral College so that New York, California, and Illinois rules - the little states be D*mned.
100% renewable Energy. Lets just ban gasoline and diesel vehicles like Trucks and Cars, and depend on wind and solar energy for our needs even though they are not dependable nor sufficient.
Ban Guns. Who cares if illegal Aliens come across the border with them. Our Ranchers deserve to die and don't need no stickin 2nd Amendment. For that matter so do US Citizens, they don't need to protect themselves from MS-13, we Democrats will get around to protecting them eventually.
Democrats please engage in some more wet dreams. We are excessively entertained during this Shutdown.
$0.00 for the Wall
They are having the great delusion before the great fall!
That acting like spoiled children is working instead of backfiring. Proposing all this legislation to pander to their base also makes it look like the Democrats want to get even with Republican voters. That will hurt them in the long term, just as it did with the Assault Weapon Ban in 1994.
The only concern Dems have is to stop anything Trump from being successful. That is their primary ‘goal’... meanwhile the Globalist elites are pushing hard against our borders with these Caravans they’re funding and bringing to our border.
There’s really a three prong attack against this nation and is what Trump is fighting against. The Dems are not concerned about their base because their plan is to change the base form what it is to all the multiculralists and diversity gurus flooding our nation..
A lot of the Democrat’s old base is catching on and not liking it.
Shutdown = noun
Shut down = verb
Stop paying South American countries the 40 billion we waste there. The poor people never see a dime of it anyway.,
Click the pic to hear him say it to Judge Jeanine.
Sanctuary Nation.
Impeach Trump and Pence at the same time to promote Pelosi to President.
Open the government without Trump when Pelosi and the Dems come back from the New Year break.
Eternal Life on the Supreme Court for RBG.
Another white version of "Obama" in Beto O'Rourke.
Michael Avenatti for President 2020.
Editing and Approving Presidential Addresses before they are given.
De-platforming and Censorship of (fill in the blank) speech.
Nobel Peace Prize for Kolin Kaepernick.
I think we should start sending adult diapers to the House. Both for acting like children and to contain their wet dreams.
While Government is Shutdown, Democrats Engage in Wet Dreams.
Amusing themselves by abusing themselves .
Dems are sure going to have some “sore wrists” over those.
Thanks for ptting together the great link.
He said that with regards to the Russia investigation and with a lot of confidence. He came across as very positive and with a lot of energy, despite what the demokraps have been attempting to do across many fronts.
Trump’s Timetable,
I’m good with that.
Too many to keep up with - should be put to the Simon-Garfunkle tune “Slip Sliding Away”....(apologies)
I really wish I could take leftism, render it down to a concentrate, then add one drop of it in my weed killer sprayer mixed with one gallon of water to kill all the weeds on my property. Leftism is so toxic I bet that one little drop diluted in a gal of water would kill everything it touches in an hour or less.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The partial government shutdown is about more than a shutdown. It’s civil war. There are not guns or violence, at least not yet. The U.S. military has not turned against any portion of the citizens. Nobody has openly called for secession yet, at least to the point where it can credibly happen. Not just yet. Yet all these things are just beneath the surface. Any one of these things could happen, almost at any time, although — for perfectly understandable reasons — most of us prefer not yet to know it.
> Donald Trump came along in the midst of this growing crisis. He didn’t start the fire, nor did his supporters. He merely represents the frustration and outrage of the half or so of the population who has simply had enough. The people who dominate all those red counties on the political map, and who also comprise a sturdy but usually silent minority (bigger than you think) in those blue map locations.
A civil war, in psychological terms, happens when two sides reach a point of irreconcilable differences. The government shutdown and the border wall, while very important issues, are not the only issues dividing this country. The country is divided on even bigger things, such as whether we should move toward higher taxes and socialism or lower taxes and capitalism; more regulation or less regulation; more control for the Democratic-Republican establishment in D.C., or less. Should we use all our military force against militant Islam, or bow down and blame ourselves, as Obama did? Should we permit other countries — China, European countries — the advantages of capitalism while imposing on ourselves the disadvantages of socialism? Or should we fight back, as President Trump has done?
The root issue of all political conflict, including our own, boils down to one factor: The individual versus the state. Does the individual have the right to make up one’s own mind about one’s life, or should government be involved in making many or most decisions for us? Whether the issue is gay marriage, abortion, taxes, capitalism/socialism, whether or when to utilize military force, what the budget should be, or anything else, that’s what it all boils down to. Even the border wall issue applies here. To border wall advocates, it’s an issue of whether the federal government should set up boundaries between our (hopefully) free country and individuals or nations who are not free, who may be hostile and threatening, and should in some way be screened before coming into our (hopefully) free country. This didn’t used to be controversial. But the Democrats have moved so far left — no border wall, no borders at all — that the divide seems new, and it is new for that reason.
Our country today reminds me so, so much of a marriage at the end of its time. I am sorry to say it, but it’s true. Sometimes a marriage therapist tells a couple, “It just seems like so much work. You’re fundamentally divided on so many matters. Why don’t you just divide up your property and go your separate ways? Set yourselves free?” There are times when it’s rational to conclude this, which is why divorce and breakups are often rational.
The smart couples do break up and rationally divide up their property — even time with their children — and move on, often to better and calmer lives. Will that happen in America? Not a chance, based on the way it looks right now.
Americans no longer seem to agree on the fundamentals. The Second Amendment is now up for grabs. For years, Democrats have claimed to support the Second Amendment in theory, but now they are prepared to pass legislation in effect outlawing guns (or ammunition, which is the same thing). It turns out when they said, for all those years, that “the Second Amendment applies to the military, not to individuals, even peaceful ones,” they really meant it. This alone is an unsustainable and unresolvable difference. Am I wrong? Prove me wrong. I’d love to be wrong. I see no compromise on this point.
And now the First Amendment could be at risk too. Increasingly, it seems that leftists, self-described progressives and Democrats really mean it when they say, “Hate speech isn’t protected by the First Amendment.” Seriously? What is hate speech? I have been called a promoter of hate speech for supporting President Trump on many matters and opposing Democrats. Is that what we’ve come to? Is hate speech now speech I don’t like? And regardless of how one defines “hate speech”, how on earth do you reconcile the First Amendment with anyone’s speech — however it’s characterized — being subject to any kind of government regulation or chilling whatsoever?
When two or more parties disagree on matters of principle, you’re at a point of civil breakdown. The First and Second Amendments are at the top of our Bill of Rights for a reason. When the two major political parties disagree on these two most precious components of individual liberty — the right to defend your body and to speak your mind — then civility is over. What a literal civil war would look like, in the twenty-first century in the USA, I frankly have no idea. Maybe we’re already in it. The government shutdown is a metaphor for the impossible, irreconcilable differences between two schools of thought. I keep thinking: This is what civil war looks like. Each side wants the other to humble him- or herself. But it’s not going to happen. Never, ever with the Democrats, who have never once caved on anything, ever. And no longer with the dissenters or so-called “deplorables”, at least if President Trump is any indication.
I don’t know the answer or solution. I only know one thing: The cause of the breakdown, whenever it happens, always resides in the most important issue in any political or social matter: The individual versus the state. If there is any solution to find, it will be there.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I don't know how to link this.
That would do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.