Nope. Not sealed any more, though it WAS filed under seal on 12-20-18.
Check your own link. Top right corner you can see the words "SEALED INDICTMENT. Scroll down to find the filing date, 12-20-18.
Previously Sealed, Now Unsealed Indictment.
Kinda throws a wrench into your history of poo-pooing the sealed indictment thing, right?
But you go head on with your "she pissed off Mueller" derp tale.
Oh, and maybe add this to the "Huber Watch" series?
uk uk uk uk.
#ItsFallingApartDerpo
#SurrenderNow
p.s. It would be helpful if you read your own links before opening your derp hole.
ThankQ.
Bagster
No. I've never discounted the existence of sealed indictments, they happen all the time. Almost every search-warrant is issued as a sealed indictment.
I've questioned the statistics generated by Q followers (and linked by Q on several occassions, I believe) that show that linear growth in sealed indictments of roughly 5,000 a month over the last year so that now we have roughly 50,000 or 60,000.
My take is that there is zero indication that any of those have anything to do with the whole narrative of the coming D-day with unsealing of thousands of indictments, arrests of thousands of Deep State operatives for treason and sex crimes, possibly by the Marines or the U.S. Marhsalls, and the quick transport of the arrested to GITMO and other military detention sites, to be followed by military tribunals.
So, no, the fact that Mueller and his best-buddies in the SDNY have used a sealed indictment to go after the Russian Attorney, who is a witness in the ridiculous Mueller Witch Hunt's main focal point, the notorious "Trump Tower Meeting" -- does nothing to discourage me in my interpretation of things.
It would not surprise me at all that Mueller (and his buddies in the SDNY US Attorney's office) have a dozen more sealed indictments of people vaguely related to Trump who they want to pressure, force into guilty pleas, and get to behave like Trump's former personal attorney (also prosecuted by SNDY after a Mueller hand off) and plead guilty to make believe crimes.
Still no sign of those military arrests of Deep Staters though, bagster. That's the part I'm skeptical about.
so relieved that you’re sharp enough to catch his errors Bags...I’m too easily taken in.