Thought it was 17 years but anyway, mom must have had quite a professional job to qualify those SS numbers 23 years ago
“”Thought it was 17 years but anyway, mom must have had quite a professional job to qualify those SS numbers 23 years ago””
1994-2017 - 23 years - $1500+ per month. I don’t know how the other poster came up with 17 years. The mother COULD have had a very good paying job OR she could have put off retiring until later instead of taking SS at age 65 - that choice added considerably to some retirees monthly benefit before the age was changed.
I wonder if the guy’s life style reflected more than his salary as a city employee. If so, no one questioned it? Or could be as a cop, he was considered to be on the take and in Chicago, no big deal? Is he being asked for restitution?