Q Anon: 09/09/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 09/09/18 | FReepers, vanity

[stylin19a]

I probably should ping this to everybody cause someone said I make sense.

[Disestablishmentarian]

MY INTERPRETATION of q-2170:

1) Q begins with a question: "How do you demonstrate 'reasonable cause' to regulate and/or break up BIG TECH?"

2) Then Q presents a repeating pattern:

-Aggression (Projection)
-Suppression (Fascism)
-Censorship (Narrative-Dogma)

3) Then Q demonstrates that MULTIPLE ENTITIES are carrying out the SAME PROGRAM. These include [ANTIFA], [FAKE NEWS] and [[TWITTER, FB, GOOG, YT, REDDIT, etc..].

4) The ANSWER to Q's Question JUMPS OUT at us. The pattern, ganging together to ban lawful websites, public speakers etc. is a CONSPIRACY IN THE RESTRAINT OF TRADE. It VIOLATES the SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT and is subject to criminal prosecution as well as the potential awarding of treble damages to its victims.

Here is a synopsis from Cornell Law School:

Broad and sweeping in scope, § 1 of the Act states that “[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.” § 2 of the Act further prohibits monopolization or attempts at monopolizing any aspect of interstate trade or commerce and makes the act a felony. Federal district courts have the jurisdiction to enjoin violations of the Sherman Act, and these proceedings are instituted by United States Attorneys in their respective districts. The injured party (whether it is the federal government, an individual state, or a private party) is entitled to three times the amount of injury that it has suffered; this award is known as treble damages.

For a full text of the Sherman Antitrust Act, see:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/usc_sup_01_15_10_1.html

[Tuscaloosa Goldfinch]

I still tend to look back on those times and think we had real media in those days and the Soviets did not.

I was in Moscow for a few days in the 90's and happened to read an English language translation of a Russian newspaper. I was kind of amazed at how the political figures disparaged each other, commenting on their mental health and saying they should be institutionalized. Twenty years later, and the left here is doing the same thing.

[grey_whiskers]

My face turned green when I saw that the pink Hostess cupcake frosting was covered with yellow mold.

[Defiant]

ISIS and al Qaeda don’t have free speech rights in the US. Communists do, although I think they shouldn’t. Pedophiles don’t. Nazis and racists do. Free speech is a tough thing.

By the way, Facebook doesn’t censor ISIS or al Qaeda as things now stand.

[Defiant]

That sounds like an old bit, but I’m not familiar with it.

[Defiant]

That is a mongolian pussy hat.

In those days, they didn’t shave, so things got a little, uhm, hairy.

[ichabod1]

I think we should appoint a Blue Ribbon Committee to find out what really went on. Jamie Gorelick is available.

[Disestablishmentarian]

(more on) MY INTERPRETATION of Q-2170:

I meant to add one more thing, in reference to Q’s opening question: “How do you demonstrate ‘reasonable cause’ to regulate and/or break up BIG TECH?” ...

If a person or company sues under the Sherman Act, they may be entitled to monetary damages; HOWEVER, if the DoJ sues, and wins, in addition to other criminal penalties, they may be entitled to “STRUCTURAL RELIEF.”

“Structural Relief” may mean BREAKING UP THE COMPANY, as happened to Standard Oil and to the old AT&T (aka the BELL SYSTEM).

Q: “Break up BIG TECH.”

And one more thing (my best Columbo imitation)...

These BIG TECH Companies may be deemed to be both COMPETITORS and SUPPLIERS to some of the entities they are suppressing ... ANOTHER SIGNIFICANT TEST (known as vertical/horizontal relationship, if I recall) for GUILT under the Sherman Act.

[Bob Ireland]

***By the way, Facebook doesn’t censor ISIS or al Qaeda as things now stand***

My point exactly... organizing terror attacks is mild in comparison to the horror of defending Donald Trump; Silicon Valley has to have some standards. 😏

[Right-wing Librarian]

The confirmation vote should have been scheduled immediately following the hearings. Waiting so many days to vote just left the DS lots of time to hatch more evil plots.

Who is to blame for this wait? McTurdle?

[bagster]

Aw, geeze. Not you again, Hudson.

#We'reNotGonnaMakeItMan

#DrFemaleHygieneProduct.

Bagster

[generally]

Wow.

I’ve never taken a poly sci class, but I feel like I just learned a semester’s worth from your post!

ThankQ!

[bagster]

In those days, they didn’t shave, so things got a little, uhm, hairy.

Haha.

I thought I was bad.

Bagster

[bagster]

I love, love, LOVE your interpretation of Q post #2170,

I might just marry it.

Bagster

[generally]

https://twitter.com/TheSharpEdge1/status/1040299088019841025

All solar observatory cams offline.

Is this true? If so, I gotta believe it’s more than Chinese spying. Unless the Chinese are running every single one of them.

I’m starting to like my weather control theory......

[Disestablishmentarian]

:)

[Disestablishmentarian]

At last I am speechless.

[generally]

Note : "HAMMER"

Q reference to Hammer time?

I think so.

[torqemada]

Geez - Is there anyone here who doesn’t have a skeleton in their closet from their high school years? These a*shats don’t even get called out for “reaching” into ancient history for a tawdry rumor from someone seeking 15 min. of fame? Battle staions! Set fire to their phones, emails, and Twitter feed. Give no quarter.