When the truth doesn’t get you what you want, CNN does what it knows best.
Doesn’t make sense. If you go to the trouble if faking it, why use a different color ink?
Team Moore is finally doing the right thing. If he is telling the truth then the ink signature in the yearbook can not be 40 years old and that is something that is testable. Them calling for forensic analysis of the signature and the ink by a third party is genius. They also identified that he had rule against her in a divorce case 20 years ago which provides motive for her hold a grudge against him. I suspect she has financial problems. I suspect someone in left wing politics arranged a payment and put her in touch with Gloria Allred. I thought the “D.A.” was strange along with the annotation of the location and it appears to be sourced from her divorce papers.
Team Moore did another smart thing by putting together testimonials from people who have worked with and around Moore. Moore is a judge and judges accumulate enemies and not only was he a judge but also a very polarizing political figure so there are plenty of people that would say anything negative to hurt him. I think he also should arrange a polygraph. It should be secret and private till it is made certain that the results could not be construed to hurt him but if it turns out good it would be a big public opinion boost.
That is the way these things have to be looked at. Allred really provided the key to Moore’s salvation or destruction. The most serious allegation isn’t the 14 year old. Dating a young woman with her parents permission isn’t a crime and even she says he never had sex with her. The attempted sex assault claim by Young Nelson if invalidate will deflate the whole narrative.