Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Politicization of Motherhood
WSJ ^ | Oct. 27, 2017 | James Taranto

Posted on 10/29/2017 7:28:25 AM PDT by Pontiac

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Pontiac
She cites the view of one neuroscientist, Nim Tottenham of Columbia University, “that babies are born without a central nervous system” and “mothers are the central nervous system to babies,” especially for the first nine months after birth.

What? Born with no central nervous system? NO! Babies have their very own central nervous system. The mother and the baby are separate beings, one dependent on the other, yes. But they are separate.

This neuroscientist really should not use hyperbole. If a baby was born without a central nervous system, that baby would be considered very ill and would die soon after birth.

21 posted on 10/29/2017 9:14:36 AM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
Young men want their wives to work as much as them and make as much money as them.

Make as much money and still do twice the housework, from what I've seen.

22 posted on 10/29/2017 9:21:06 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady (Why pay to get lectured by Hollywood on how awful whiteness is when MSM does it for free?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I have a subscription.

See post number 5 for an interview with the author that does not go in to the political ramifications of the book.


23 posted on 10/29/2017 9:48:22 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
What? Born with no central nervous system? NO! Babies have their very own central nervous system. The mother and the baby are separate beings, one dependent on the other, yes. But they are separate.

What does that mean? “Every time a mother comforts a baby in distress, she’s actually regulating that baby’s emotions from the outside in. After three years, the baby internalizes that ability to regulate their emotions, but not until then.”

Not the most adroit way to make the point I grant you.

Perhaps a better way to say it is that a newborn’s nervous system is not fully developed and it is in need of a mother’s constant attention in order for that system to develop properly.

To anyone who has observed a newborn this should make perfect sense.

Read some stories about Russian orphanages and their treatment of orphaned newborns and the consequences to those children and this article and the book take on a new meaning.

The Russian orphanages is an extreme example but the concept is clear mothers are critical to the development of newborns and children as a whole.

24 posted on 10/29/2017 9:59:23 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
One young woman “asked me what my book was about. I told her, and she got so angry. She almost had fire coming out of her eyes, she was so angry at my message.

She must have had blood coming out of her wherever.

25 posted on 10/29/2017 10:00:07 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (I was not elected to continue a failed system. I was elected to change it. --Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

No argument


26 posted on 10/29/2017 10:00:19 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
But to say that a baby has no central nervous system is just plain false.

Not fully developed and dependent on the mother for its natural growth is quite different than saying there is no central nervous system at all.

I think the neuroscientist may be relapsing into his pro-abort speak (my guess) because if he mainly thinks that a baby is nothing but a blob of cells then I can see where he may jump to the conclusion that just born babies have no central nervous systems.

However, if he flipped through his own neurobiology research journals he have to come to a correct conclusion.

27 posted on 10/29/2017 10:07:44 AM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

I found the full article without a paywall here:

http://www.cetusnews.com/life/The-Politicization-of-Motherhood.rk-asBGzCb.html

Near the end it is revealed that this author thinks employers should be forced to offer a full year of maternity leave. That’s problematic. Otherwise, I agree that science is now proving what centuries of commonsense already knew: newborns and infants need their mother’s constant attention for several years.

Since science is now validating common sense, that means liberals with their superior intellects will be able to grasp this concept around 50 to 70 years from now.


28 posted on 10/29/2017 10:14:44 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (I was not elected to continue a failed system. I was elected to change it. --Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Thanks!


29 posted on 10/29/2017 10:17:35 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Unless I am mistaken, I'm infallible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

see post 28

Albion Wilde found the full article posted elsewhere.


30 posted on 10/29/2017 10:35:19 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
Since science is now validating common sense, that means liberals with their superior intellects will be able to grasp this concept around 50 to 70 years from now.

They will grasp the concept only when it is to their advantage to do so politically.

And not before.

As any good communist will tell you science serves the party or it is not science. Hence you have Global Warming as settled science.

31 posted on 10/29/2017 10:38:37 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
One young woman “asked me what my book was about. I told her, and she got so angry. She almost had fire coming out of her eyes, she was so angry at my message. She said, ‘You are going to set women back 50 years.’ I said, ‘Gosh, I wouldn’t want to do that.’ ”

How is having babies and taking care of them a set back for women?
The screeching feminists that are murdering their babies and helping destroy male/female relationships are doing that. Feminism has destroyed so much they can't even see it.

32 posted on 10/29/2017 11:49:50 AM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

You nailed it. I resign from my full time job when our oldest was 13 months. It took many months to convince my husband to forgo my income, despite him having had a stay at home mom (who was constantly pushing for me to not work). His profession was one in which earnings were based on a schedule, not performance.
Tv
I think it was a fear of bearing all the responsibility himself. It was a very rare thing in our sphere at that time. He is now a full believer in living on one income, he’s forgotten how he was against it in the beginning;-). His coworkers at the time thought he was insane for “letting” me not contribute anything. Other young moms often told me their husbands just refused to go without her income even though the women wanted to be home with their babies.

Two years ago I pushed him to let me work part time (2-3 evenings/week waiting tables) and I sort of regret it! Moms are needed at home and I see issues with our younger kids that I didn’t see with the older kids at that age. Not sure it’s really worth it, but it helps pay for things we went without for a long time-like paper towels (luxury item that I adore) and classical dance lessons for the girls.


33 posted on 10/29/2017 12:13:35 PM PDT by NorthstarMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NorthstarMom
Not sure it’s really worth it, but it helps pay for things we went without for a long time-like paper towels (luxury item that I adore) and classical dance lessons for the girls.

Hard choices I agree.

I wish my wife and I had made different choices. Teenagers need mothers at home every bit as much as infants I believe.

A watchful I and a firm hand keeps the devil at bay.

34 posted on 10/29/2017 1:37:24 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson