Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Were Confederate Generals Traitors?
Creators ^ | June 28, 2017 | Walter E. Williams

Posted on 06/28/2017 11:20:43 AM PDT by Sopater

My "Rewriting American History" column of a fortnight ago, about the dismantling of Confederate monuments, generated considerable mail. Some argued there should not be statues honoring traitors such as Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson and Jefferson Davis, who fought against the Union. Victors of wars get to write the history, and the history they write often does not reflect the facts. Let's look at some of the facts and ask: Did the South have a right to secede from the Union? If it did, we can't label Confederate generals as traitors.

Article 1 of the Treaty of Paris (1783), which ended the war between the Colonies and Great Britain, held "New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and Independent States." Representatives of these states came together in Philadelphia in 1787 to write a constitution and form a union.

During the ratification debates, Virginia's delegates said, "The powers granted under the Constitution being derived from the people of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression." The ratification documents of New York and Rhode Island expressed similar sentiments.

At the Constitutional Convention, a proposal was made to allow the federal government to suppress a seceding state. James Madison, the "Father of the Constitution," rejected it. The minutes from the debate paraphrased his opinion: "A union of the states containing such an ingredient (would) provide for its own destruction. The use of force against a state would look more like a declaration of war than an infliction of punishment and would probably be considered by the party attacked as a dissolution of all previous compacts by which it might be bound."

America's first secessionist movement started in New England after the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. Many were infuriated by what they saw as an unconstitutional act by President Thomas Jefferson. The movement was led by Timothy Pickering of Massachusetts, George Washington's secretary of war and secretary of state. He later became a congressman and senator. "The principles of our Revolution point to the remedy — a separation," Pickering wrote to George Cabot in 1803, for "the people of the East cannot reconcile their habits, views, and interests with those of the South and West." His Senate colleague James Hillhouse of Connecticut agreed, saying, "The Eastern states must and will dissolve the union and form a separate government." This call for secession was shared by other prominent Americans, such as John Quincy Adams, Elbridge Gerry, Fisher Ames, Josiah Quincy III and Joseph Story. The call failed to garner support at the 1814-15 Hartford Convention.

The U.S. Constitution would have never been ratified — and a union never created — if the people of those 13 "free sovereign and Independent States" did not believe that they had the right to secede. Even on the eve of the War of 1861, unionist politicians saw secession as a right that states had. Rep. Jacob M. Kunkel of Maryland said, "Any attempt to preserve the union between the states of this Confederacy by force would be impractical and destructive of republican liberty." The Northern Democratic and Republican parties favored allowing the South to secede in peace.

Northern newspapers editorialized in favor of the South's right to secede. New-York Tribune (Feb. 5, 1860): "If tyranny and despotism justified the Revolution of 1776, then we do not see why it would not justify the secession of Five Millions of Southrons from the Federal Union in 1861." The Detroit Free Press (Feb. 19, 1861): "An attempt to subjugate the seceded States, even if successful, could produce nothing but evil — evil unmitigated in character and appalling in extent." The New-York Times (March 21, 1861): "There is a growing sentiment throughout the North in favor of letting the Gulf States go."

Confederate generals were fighting for independence from the Union just as George Washington and other generals fought for independence from Great Britain. Those who'd label Gen. Robert E. Lee as a traitor might also label George Washington as a traitor. I'm sure Great Britain's King George III would have agreed.


TOPICS: History; Society
KEYWORDS: americanhistory; confederate; dixie; freedom; liberty; southerndemocrats; traitors; virginia; walterwilliams; yes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461 next last
No, they were patriots.
1 posted on 06/28/2017 11:20:43 AM PDT by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater

If you try to secede and lead a successful revolution, then you are a patriot. If you lose, you are a traitor. The winners write history. Thats just how it works.


2 posted on 06/28/2017 11:23:07 AM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
"the people of the East cannot reconcile their habits, views, and interests with those of the South and West."

Some things never change...

3 posted on 06/28/2017 11:24:13 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
If you try to secede and lead a successful revolution, then you are a patriot. If you lose, you are a traitor. The winners write history. Thats just how it works.

So, if you lead a revolution against tyranny, you won't know if you're doing your patriotic duty until the fight is over?
4 posted on 06/28/2017 11:25:04 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
The winners write history. Thats just how it works.

Well... that's how history works. But I think the thing in question here is truth, not history.

5 posted on 06/28/2017 11:26:44 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Which ones were tried as traitors? AFAIK, none.


6 posted on 06/28/2017 11:27:42 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The North’s battle cry- “Union.”
The South’s battle cry- “Freedom.”
Nuff said.


7 posted on 06/28/2017 11:27:49 AM PDT by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I believe their pardons were worked out in the terms of surrender. Except maybe for Mosby and his Raiders.


8 posted on 06/28/2017 11:30:36 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
I am not a Southerner, but I never thought of the Confederate states as "rebel", nor the leaders traitors.

I look at the northeast states now and it is easy to see why the South wanted to be done with them, so do I. They were just a bit ahead of the times.

9 posted on 06/28/2017 11:34:20 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I thought all of this historical fact was common knowledge and made common sense. It is a shame that this needs to be written.


10 posted on 06/28/2017 11:40:06 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Those who fired upon Fort Sumter may have had a problem.


11 posted on 06/28/2017 11:42:13 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Southrons!

Lol.

I remember when the morons infiltrated here and called themselves Southrons.


12 posted on 06/28/2017 11:46:03 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Article 1 of the Treaty of Paris (1783), which ended the war between the Colonies and Great Britain, held "New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and Independent States." Representatives of these states came together in Philadelphia in 1787 to write a constitution and form a union.

The Treaty of Paris also said it was between two countries, not thirteen.

13 posted on 06/28/2017 11:46:15 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Which ones were tried as traitors? AFAIK, none.

True. However, they are currently being tried in the court of "public opinion" as many liberals in the fair cities of the South are working to remove the monuments to their memories.
14 posted on 06/28/2017 11:46:26 AM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Anyhow.

They was Dems.

Dems is always traitors.


15 posted on 06/28/2017 11:47:02 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomjusticeruleoflaw
The South’s battle cry- “Freedom.”


16 posted on 06/28/2017 11:48:21 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Traitors by definition, became the enemy of the US.


17 posted on 06/28/2017 11:49:29 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

No matter what they did, one side would have called them traitors.

That, unfortunately, is how civil war works.

Far as I can tell, there were good and bad points about both sides of the war. They both had some good and bad arguments about the rightness of their cause.

To demonize one side or the other is to willfully ignore the lessons of history.


18 posted on 06/28/2017 11:50:55 AM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
I won't argue the point, but as a Yankee I have no trouble stipulating that they were traitors.

That said, they lost real bad and I am so-o-o-o-o-o over it.

Not even a little bit of temptation to desecrate their graves. I'm just not that kind of guy.

19 posted on 06/28/2017 11:51:55 AM PDT by Salman (I don't do Facebook, and neither should you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomjusticeruleoflaw

“The North’s battle cry- “Union.”
The South’s battle cry- “Freedom.”
Nuff said.”

Ha ha.

This is why no one takes you (not you personally per se) seriously and communists can demagogue and use your stupidity to hurt all of us.

Southern Cry was literally Slavery.

If it wasn’t for the stupid Southern Democrats we’d never have had Obama and never have fallen in to the position we are in where we are practically a communist state.

It is all the Confederate’s fault and, more so, their successors who implemented Jim Crow and their other Big Government policies.


20 posted on 06/28/2017 11:52:28 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson