Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2017 Government of Kenya endorses Barack Obama 1961 Coast Province Hospital birth certificate
ohforgoodnesssake.com ^ | May 28, 2017 | OFHG

Posted on 05/28/2017 6:53:27 PM PDT by Bunyan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: Fantasywriter

Forgot the link:

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/randy-hall/2014/09/09/even-new-yorker-editor-laments-obamas-anthology-botched-pronouncements-0


101 posted on 05/29/2017 1:39:08 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: calenel

You are the one who’s wrong.


102 posted on 05/29/2017 1:57:53 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Bunyan

It is superfluous and timing seems odd


103 posted on 05/29/2017 5:17:04 PM PDT by t4texas (Remember the Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: calenel

The original kid died and the CIA substituted the Djakarta street kid.

.


104 posted on 05/29/2017 6:20:15 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

If he was republican the college records would have leaked or would have been produced by the college for inspection.


105 posted on 05/29/2017 6:25:51 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
Here is Valerie Jarrett unsubtly affirming that Obama’s grades stink. The phrases, ‘never ... been challenged,’ and, ‘too talented to do what ordinary people do,’ are code for, ‘He was too bored to play the, ‘make good grades,’ game:

"Beneath his dignity" is a common trope for people who fail at something. The greater danger perpetrated by Liberal control of the media is that they cover up news that is detrimental to them and their ideas.

There never was a media outcry to see Obama's grades. The very same people who cannot stop demanding to see Trump's tax returns just had absolutely no interest in any proof regarding Obama's "genius" or even legitimacy as a citizen.

‘In his book The Bridge, Remnick happily forwarded top Obama sycophant Valerie Jarrett claiming Obama was so brilliant that “I think that he has never really been challenged intellectually....He’s been bored to death his whole life. He’s just too talented to do what ordinary people do. He would never be satisfied with what ordinary people do.”’

And yet short of getting elected to a government job, he has no accomplishments to which he or anyone else could point. He's done nothing of significance in his entire existence prior to becoming President, and those "significant" things he did as President were all bad and were the acts of a fool not a genius.

106 posted on 05/30/2017 7:24:15 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Excellent points. You know, the thing that strikes me most about Jarrett’s comment is the skin-crawly creepiness of it. It is not in any respect subordinate to the personality-cult statements made about, for example, Stalin. You have these people who, as you pointed out, have actually accomplished very little. Yet in their own minds they are uniquely talented and brilliant. So they gather worshipers around them who are as bizarrely detached from reality as they are. It becomes an actual psychosis—a very creepy psychosis.

It will be interesting to see who writes Obama’s next memoir. The one thing we know for sure: it won’t be Obama.


107 posted on 05/30/2017 1:15:59 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
So they gather worshipers around them who are as bizarrely detached from reality as they are. It becomes an actual psychosis—a very creepy psychosis.

The left has cornered the market on crazy. Insanity is just another day's work for them.

It will be interesting to see who writes Obama’s next memoir. The one thing we know for sure: it won’t be Obama.

Not unless it has something to do with apes and figs in a grotto. :)

108 posted on 05/30/2017 1:34:33 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: calenel
Wrong yet again (still). Stop it with the extra made-up conditions for being a natural born citizen. Citizen at birth, that's all it means.

While there are numerous aspects to Obama's birth and status that make him undesirable, if he was actually born in HI he is a natural-born citizen per the Founders' chosen definition. If he was born in Kenya, he is not. That's the bottom line. Your made up garbage makes you, and by extension, the rest of us, look like kooks.


The Supreme Court has addressed the subject, and clearly stated that the term 'natural born Citizen', means a person born in a country of parents who are it's citizens.
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.
The founders heavily relied on Vattel, and his The Law of Nations when forming the Country. It's even ironic, that a few years back, when there was much ballyhoo over the library book that was never returned by George Washington, was a copy of The Law of Nations.

This is what The Law of Nations has to say about the term 'natural born Citizen'
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.


The word 'natural', in 'natural born Citizen', is a reference to natural law and in such context means - someone a Citizen at birth via natural law. Natural law is underlying law that exists without positive (man made) law. So, a natural born Citizen requires no positive law in order to be a Citizen.

So, it's clear that 'natural born Citizen', and 'Citizen at birth', are not equatable, because positive law can be written to grant Citizenship where natural law does not.
109 posted on 05/30/2017 1:36:32 PM PDT by MMaschin (The difference between strategy and tactics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: calenel
Wrong yet again (still). Stop it with the extra made-up conditions for being a natural born citizen. Citizen at birth, that's all it means.

While there are numerous aspects to Obama's birth and status that make him undesirable, if he was actually born in HI he is a natural-born citizen per the Founders' chosen definition. If he was born in Kenya, he is not. That's the bottom line. Your made up garbage makes you, and by extension, the rest of us, look like kooks.


The Supreme Court has addressed the subject, and clearly stated that the term 'natural born Citizen', means a person born in a country of parents who are it's citizens.
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.
The founders heavily relied on Vattel, and his The Law of Nations when forming the Country. It's even ironic, that a few years back, when there was much ballyhoo over the library book that was never returned by George Washington, was a copy of The Law of Nations.

This is what The Law of Nations has to say about the term 'natural born Citizen'
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.


The word 'natural', in 'natural born Citizen', is a reference to natural law and in such context means - someone a Citizen at birth via natural law. Natural law is underlying law that exists without positive (man made) law. So, a natural born Citizen requires no positive law in order to be a Citizen.

So, it's clear that 'natural born Citizen', and 'Citizen at birth', are not equatable, because positive law can be written to grant Citizenship where natural law does not.
110 posted on 05/30/2017 1:43:18 PM PDT by MMaschin (The difference between strategy and tactics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

bfl


111 posted on 05/30/2017 1:46:58 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

‘The left has cornered the market on crazy. Insanity is just another day’s work for them.’

Bol!

+1

Yes, a short, sophomoric poem on antisemitism Obama could handle. He’s also very good [s/] at writing homosexually-oriented exam questions:

‘Law week, two men, Richard and Michael, walked into you office and asked for your help.

You learn that they are a monogamous, gay couple who have been living
together for the past ten years. Both men are successful architects, and after devoting the past decade on their respective careers, they have now decided that they want to marry and raise children together.’

http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/is-obama-stupid-and-lazy/


112 posted on 05/30/2017 1:49:36 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/is-obama-stupid-and-lazy/

That's a good find. I always recognized that Obama is an ignorant simpleton, but this lays out a pretty good objective case for it.

I'm glad that you made me aware of that.

Obama "the genius" is the full blown creation of the New York and Los Angeles media systems. They censored all evidence that he was an affirmative action fool, and only promoted information that made it appear that he was something more than a guy who rode his blackness to success by exploiting white liberal guilt.

They deliberately lied to us to get this incompetent moron elected. This is why we need to beat them into a bloody pulp and take away their power to lie to us.

113 posted on 05/30/2017 2:42:30 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I’m glad you like the article! Agree totally that the MSM created the myth of Obama—media malpractice at its worst.

This also explains the MSM’s flaming, pathological Trump-hate. Trump got elected in the teeth of everything the MSM could throw at him. Now he’s systematically dismantling Obama’s big ‘accomplishments.’ If Trump succeeds, the MSM may end up in padded cells, forever mumbling, ‘But muh Russia...muh Russia.’

Trump has a gift for driving his detractors insane. In the case of the MSM, they’re halfway there already.


114 posted on 05/30/2017 5:48:56 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Bunyan

The guy in the picture is not James Orengo.

http://info.mzalendo.com/person/james-orengo/

Who is he?

If someone took pictures of a bunch of random people in Honolulu holding the Obama Hawaiian birth certificate that would be proof of something?


115 posted on 06/01/2017 8:40:14 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

When was the Kenya BC certified by the Kenya parliament?

As far as I can tell there has been no official or unofficial statement from the Kenya government on this paper.

FWIW, Dr. Maganga supposedly emailed a response to a question about this paper and said it was not official. But anyone can write anything.


116 posted on 06/01/2017 8:47:42 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mashood

Everyone’s records are sealed by federal law. You can’t get Trump’s anymore than you can get Obama’s.


117 posted on 06/01/2017 8:53:44 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Some of the Framers were not natural born to the colonies. James Wilson, Alexander Hamilton for example.

At one point in the Convention it was suggested that senators needed to be native born to be eligible. Wilson argued this was not fair to people like him as he was helping to write the Constitution but would be prohibited from being in the government it created.


118 posted on 06/01/2017 8:59:54 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

The forger’s blog (will not link to it) has a number of photos of a little girl holding the same piece paper.

Maybe she is the minister of lands.


119 posted on 06/01/2017 9:04:45 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan
The forger’s blog (will not link to it) has a number of photos of a little girl holding the same piece paper. Who is the forger?
120 posted on 06/01/2017 2:32:15 PM PDT by Bunyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson