Maybe theyre trying to keep on the good side of the Clintons on the off chance that Chelsea gets into Congress. Thats the only reason I can think of for an 87% reduction, instead of 100%.
Perhaps the Clintons made it clear that 13% was the minimum it takes to keep them from fingering certain Norwegian politicians or organizations.
Mr. niteowl77
23 posted on 11/19/2016 4:10:37 PM PST by niteowl77
(Don't need no Bushes. Don't need no Clintons. Don't need no fooling around.)