And I don't recall 0bama's DOJ defending their religious liberties.
And I don't recall 0bama's DOJ defending their religious liberties.
They were specifically targeted because of their Christian beliefs.
You will notice that the queers and homo judges don’t go after Muslimb businesses.
They refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding against their religious beliefs, and were fined $65,000
Some mulsims refused to deliver beer against their religious beliefs and were awarded $125,000
“Bake the f****** cake, bigot!”
Thats what Kasich says.
The GAYSTAPO strikes again. Our intolerance, not yours.
However, Traitorobama and his thugs will have their constitutional rights respected in their trial, conviction, and sentencing for treason. And the watching multitudes will also offer their cheers as Traitorobama and his thugs on the gallows experience that short drop and quick stop.
You’re right about them becoming fascists.
In a live and let live society that they profess to want, they sure seem to demand that we live the way they want.
Liberty for me, but not for thee.
No such thing per the HRC: just an excuse for bigotry.
I know they were too Christian to say it....but I’m not.
EFF these fascists.
It is time for some people with a good working knowledge of English to be in the judicial system. Because ain’t a damn one of them seem to understand what “shall not be infringed” or “make no law..”
Remember when they demanded homosexual behavior to be removed from the DSM-III( Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Psychological disorders)? They’re also tried to politically change the origins of simian/HIV. Their tolerance levels are a BIT poor.
If I’m not mistaken, they are appealing this state fascism to federal court from various angles related to religious freedom.
Not unexpected but breaks my heart anyways.
Bake the cake, don’t decorate it. Tell them to take it home and put what ever they want on it. “Its against my religion”, that’s all. ???? Now, go into a Muslim deli and ask for a ham on rye or 2 lbs of pork chops.
… even when military service was involuntary [draft], we still made room for conscientious objectors who did not want to carry weapons. If we can allow people to exempt themselves [based on religious belief] from defending the country—which is the most important responsibility our government has—we can certainly allow people to exempt themselves from performing same-sex wedding ceremonies!
- Frank Turek
There should have been a buycott for them.
They could have sold cookies and muffins, etc online.
They may have ended up with more business.
They could have even put Christian symbols or verses on the baked goods.
The phallus inhalers and carpet munchers want to eliminate Christianity from this country, so they can do whatever the hell they want.
bkmk
Sorry to hear of them closing.
The minimum known cost in this case for business owners with religious convictions who are evidently ignorant of their 14th Amendment protections from state abridgment of their constitutionally enumerated rights.
14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Citizens with religious convictions should also note regarding exercising their 14th Amendment protections that Acts 22:23-30 shows that Paul claimed his rights as a Roman citizen to save himself from being flogged.
I’ve said before that the way around this problem is for Christian businesses to get together a group of conservative churches, and make a contract that they will only provide that particular item to couples that go through those churches.
This works because churches can legally discriminate. They can refuse to marry homosexuals.
This would mean that they could sell everything else, all other baked goods, to the public, but wedding cakes are exclusively through these churches. It also cuts out business from secular marriages and liberal church marriages, but that lost business would be smaller.
In this particular circumstance, when the lesbians walked in and tried to order a wedding cake, the bakery could turn them down because of this exclusive contract, saying that their wedding cakes are contractually prohibited from being sold “to the public”.
And breaking contracts like this in court is extremely hard.