Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did the Battle of Jutland Really Matter?
National Interest ^ | May 20, 2016 | Robert Farley

Posted on 05/21/2016 6:33:24 AM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Seruzawa

Barrel life on the 16”/50’s had its limits and the guns had to be fired for training and testing of the powder charges as the powder aged. They weren’t making this barrels anymore, nor the powder (left overs from WW2).

Without those guns dialed in there wasn’t much point. And besides they we fantastically expensive to crew and operate. Finally they were out ranged by missiles so their utility in a surface action had long passed.


61 posted on 05/21/2016 4:21:12 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Yes, Jutland mattered. The German Navy spent the rest of the war in harbor - a useless waste men, money, and material.


62 posted on 05/21/2016 4:34:23 PM PDT by Little Ray (NOTHING THAT SOMEONE ELSE HAS TO PAY FOR IS A RIGHT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

I know little about dreadnaughts but is the replacement difference what they would refer to? Clearly they are not carriers, but they were heavy.


63 posted on 05/21/2016 6:22:22 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who dies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
But Nagasaki...surrendering?

The only reason I knew was after he passed away I was going through some of his Navy journals about the war and saw a large black and white glossy of four very gaunt and sad looking Japanese men sitting at a table. On the back it was inscribed, "Civil officials of Nagasaki surrendering the city in the Commodore's ward room".

64 posted on 05/21/2016 8:11:16 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Sad at the individual human level, I got that.

I was a kid in Japan 1956-58. We played baseball with Japanese kids. Hadn’t a clue about Pearl Harbor until later. People were just people at street level. Our WWII Dads didn’t talk about it. The model airplanes we flew had red suns on the wings.

Mom & Dad hosted sukiyaki parties in our quarters. We read “The Magic Listening Cap” in school. Took field trips to Kyoto and the Buddha of Kamakura.

Learning about the Bataan Death March and the Rape of Nanking came much later. Knowledge about Japanese human experimentation came even later than that.


65 posted on 05/21/2016 8:37:20 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Japan still avoids teaching about their militarism and atrocities from WW2. Maybe out of shame and denial.


66 posted on 05/22/2016 3:51:41 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

I believe the New Jersey was used effectively in Lebanon, but there might be issues with collateral damage.


67 posted on 05/22/2016 4:34:51 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

And there aren’t with aircraft?


68 posted on 05/22/2016 5:41:21 AM PDT by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand. If you are French raise both hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Germany never ventured out to see again

Or to do, either.

69 posted on 05/22/2016 11:04:20 AM PDT by ThanhPhero (Khach san La Vang hanh huong tham vieng Maria La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

I’m sure there are, but I’d think they could be much more precise. Shifting winds could probably impact the trajectory of a shell over the 20+ miles the shells would fly, as opposed to more precision from at least a lower-altitude plane/helicopter.


70 posted on 05/22/2016 11:11:34 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ThanhPhero
see replace with sea ...
71 posted on 05/22/2016 11:41:01 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower; C19fan; SunkenCiv
artichokegrower: "The Battle of Jutland in 24 minutes."

Thanks for a great link!
It has a good summary & visualizations of those events, along with some analysis.

72 posted on 05/22/2016 12:01:29 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PAR35; x; C19fan
PAR35: "After Britain backed France in the First Moroccan Crisis which almost kicked off a European war that no one was really ready for, the Germans didn’t have much choice other than starting to arm with the Brits as prospective enemies."

The First Moroccan Crisis was in 1905, seven years after Germany began its navy buildup programs, in 1898.
And, that German buildup was not based on any particular event, but rather on Germany's overall desire to be recognized as a Great Power with global reach.
They thought a ratio of 2/3 German to British battleships would be sufficient for that purpose.

Nor did the Brits immediately respond to German naval production, so long as it appeared relatively small, and with other priorities focusing British attention.
But by 1909 the German threat did seem foremost, and Brits did respond with a naval buildup of their own.

It is said that sometime after 1912, Germans gave up their efforts to match British battleships and instead switched to U-boat production, of which there were 48 in service or under construction in August 1914.
And by early 1914 the German Navy's biggest enemy (as is so often the case) was not the British Navy, but rather the German Army, which needed funding for its own buildup, thus reducing the Navy's budget.

73 posted on 05/22/2016 1:12:51 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
The decision by the Germans to build a blue water navy could be considered one of the greatest strategic blunders in modern history. The move spooked the British which drew them closer to France

That was huge. For centuries, there was no love lost between Britain and France, and Germany forced them to become Allies. Germany didn't want to end the British Empire, they wanted their own Empire. Would we have been better off if Britain wasn't allied with France?

74 posted on 05/22/2016 1:18:24 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill; SunkenCiv; Robert A. Cook, PE
Fiji Hill quoting: "Thanks for the memory
In every German's mind,
When you broke the ties that bind
And dictated a pact called
the Treaty of Versailles.
How rotten that was."

The problem with Versailles is not that it was too "harsh" -- it was after all, well within limits established by Germany itself in its treatment of defeated Belgium and Russia.
The problem was that Germans did not feel defeated militarily, and so did not think they deserved any punishment for the war.
Nor did average Germans even know their own national leadership had started the war in the first place.
They believed the "war guilt" portion of Versailles was totally unjust.

Germans had hoped they would be treated by President Wilson according to his "peace without victory" promise and "14 Points".
When that didn't happen, it was a major grievance.
Nevertheless, as the German economy slowly recovered during the 1920s, Hitler's appeal was very minor.
Only with the coming Great Depression in 1930 did Hitler's words begin to gain traction amongst Germans.

75 posted on 05/22/2016 1:28:46 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK
The Allies should have also figured that cutting Germany in two with the Polish Corridor could create a casus belli in the future.
76 posted on 05/22/2016 2:46:26 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

But that sam epriod overlaps the rebellions, then the Duma, then the re-emergence of the Russian czar; and thecontinued failures of the Turkish “sultans” to run their country as it fell apart.

Place a dying Russian empire north of Turkey, a split and warring Balkans next to it between Germany-Austria and the Mediterranean ...

The world had a short fuze. Or a long fuze - I believe that is the history of the last 20 years before the war from the Balkan (NOT German-British!) point of view.


77 posted on 05/22/2016 3:13:51 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

Let’s go back a bit earlier and look at the pre-Dreadnaughts

In 1889, Britain laid down 3 battleships, Germany 0
1890 Britain 6, Germany 4
1891-94 Britain 7, Germany 0
1895 Britain 3, Germany 1
1896 Britain 2, Germany 1
1897 Britain 3, Germany 0

1898 Britain 5, Germany 3
1899 Britain 7, Germany 3
1900 Britain 1, Germany 2
1901 Britain 2, Germany 2
1902 Britain 7, Germany 3
1903 Britain 1, Germany 1
1904 Britain 2, Germany 4
1905 Britain 2, Germany 1

1898 - 1905
Britain 27, Germany 19


Dreadnaughts

Program year

1905-06 Britain 1, Germany 0
06-07 Britain 3, Germany 2
07-08 Britain 3, Germany 2
08-09 Britain 1, Germany 3
09-10 Britain 6, Germany 3
10-11 Britain 4, Germany 3
11-12 Britain 4, Germany 3
12-13 Britain 5, Germany 1
13-14 Britain 5, Germany 2

While the British did authorize a large number of battleships in the 09-10 fiscal year, it was still below the numbers laid down in 99 or 02, and does not seem to match up with any similar increase in efforts from the Germans.


78 posted on 05/22/2016 5:28:42 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Either Robert Massie or Robert Lacey wrote the book “Dreadnaught”, it is a great book on the arms buildup before W.W.I. A must read for people really interested in that.


79 posted on 05/22/2016 5:30:49 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

Massie - it’s where I got the numbers on the Dreadnaughts (appendix, page 909 and following).


80 posted on 05/22/2016 5:57:19 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson