Attorney general promises 'independent' review of Clinton email case

The Hill ^ | 2-24-2016 | Julian Hattem

[Timocrat]

So will she reveal the FBI recommendation to prosecute or not ?

[catfish1957]

Let her rip.

Or wait till 2030 when Riff Raff Gowdy finishes his investigation.

[sima_yi]

Oops! That’s TOM Hagen.

[blueunicorn6]

This is the best thing that could happen!

The problem isn’t just Hillary Clinton.

The problem is the Democrat Party.

They could have had “The Talk” with Hillary a long time ago, but they didn’t.

Everybody would have hollered for a few days and then the Democrats could look for their next candidate.

This is dragging on and on and in the backs of the minds of Democrat supporters, a new idea is taking root.

It’s just a little seed underneath the dirt in a big field, but still, it’s there and it’s alive.

And it’s growing.

“Could the Democrat Party actually be the evil party?”

This business with Hillary is like a gentle rain and warm sun every day for that seed.

Keep fighting Hillary! You’re smarter than everyone! You’re better than everyone! Sneer at them!

[oldbill]

“Yeah right, Loretta should be lynched.”

You are in serious trouble!
You just used a forbidden word and associated it with a black female.

I hope you have an encrypted IPhone.

[Know et al]

The final conclusion of the investigation should come in no later than 25 years.

[Verginius Rufus]

Yes, probably just a way to delay any decision until after the election, at which point they can announce there is no reason to prosecute.

This reminds me of Janet Reno's endless investigation of campaign wrongdoing by the Clinton-Gore campaign, which of course ended with no prosecution.

[longfellow]

I didn’t think of that but fukem.