Skip to comments.
SpaceX rocket stage fails to land on drone ship
Los Angeles Times ^
| 01/17/2016
| Geoffrey Mohan
Posted on 01/17/2016 4:14:01 PM PST by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
01/17/2016 4:14:01 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
If they can stabilize the deck on the Z axis they’ll be successful.
2
posted on
01/17/2016 4:16:51 PM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: BenLurkin
3
posted on
01/17/2016 4:25:23 PM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Jack Hydrazine
Just capture it with three remote controlled helicopters towing a huge net.
4
posted on
01/17/2016 4:27:12 PM PST
by
spokeshave
(Happy Christmas and a New Year that Trumps all.)
To: BenLurkin
Land it on land and be done with it. Weather at sea will always be a problem.
To: Jack Hydrazine
They should give up on the barge idea and simply land it on a remote landmass, or better yet, the same pad it launched from through a redesign to increase the first stage glide ratio? There would be a number of advantages to the latter.
6
posted on
01/17/2016 4:33:07 PM PST
by
amorphous
To: Jack Hydrazine
Musk tweeted the speed at landing was good. One of the legs didn’t lock.
...
However, that was not what prevented it being good. Touchdown speed was ok, but a leg lockout didn’t latch, so it tipped over after landing.
7
posted on
01/17/2016 4:34:22 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: amorphous
The barge platform could work if they build another platform above it that is able to move up and down with hydraulics to counter the ocean waves.
8
posted on
01/17/2016 4:36:10 PM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Jack Hydrazine
Like when you move a chicken’s body and her head stays still?
To: eartrumpet
10
posted on
01/17/2016 4:39:31 PM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Jack Hydrazine
Yeah, I thought of that too. Or maybe a platform that simply absorbed much of the shock through springs and shock asorbers. The barge could also be designed with underwater stabilizers. This technology is off the shelf and would work well with the barge in motion. It would have to land with a forward motion but that shouldn't be a big issue. And unlike a fixed wing that lands into the wind on a carrier, the barge could move with the wind to negate wind effects.
Stabilizer (ship)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stabilizer_%28ship%29
As you said, the Z-axis and stability is the killer on landing and afterwards. Landing back at the launch pad would still be the preferred option, IMO. ;-)
To: BenLurkin
Or just scale up one of these...robotic snake connector that seeks out and plugs into the charge socket on a Tesla.
12
posted on
01/17/2016 4:51:58 PM PST
by
spokeshave
(Happy Christmas and a New Year that Trumps all.)
To: amorphous
The type of motion compensation you suggest requires the vessel to be underway and I don’t think trying to land on a moving target will make things better. A combination of flume tanks and hydraulic motion compensation may work better but the at sea dynamics are really difficult to overcome.
13
posted on
01/17/2016 4:55:24 PM PST
by
Cannoneer
( "..raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair.." GW)
To: Cannoneer
The type of motion compensation you suggest requires the vessel to be underway and I donât think trying to land on a moving target will make things better. Actually it has the ability to land in motion now, per sey, as it is descending down through a "river of air", and must compensate. Landing on a moving platform, especially one moving with the wind could actually make things easier under certain circumstances.
To: amorphous
They should give up on the barge idea and simply land it on a remote landmass,
...
Landing on land is easier, but that still would have failed in this case because a landing leg didn’t lock. Barge landings are necessary because not all missions will have enough fuel to return the launchpad.
15
posted on
01/17/2016 5:04:15 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
Barge landings are necessary because not all missions will have enough fuel to return the launchpad. True, unless the first stage had enough flight surface to make the glide back. Maybe the extendable legs could become fixed fins with perhaps fixed or extendable canards near the top of the first stage body for additional lift and control?
To: amorphous; Moonman62
Why can't they use some of these ?
17
posted on
01/17/2016 5:54:36 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: UCANSEE2
The difference is it would be more expensive. But considering that today’s landing would have been successful if the one leg had locked in place, then the expense would be unnecessary.
18
posted on
01/17/2016 6:23:37 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Jack Hydrazine
More like a gimbaled stove on a sailboat?
19
posted on
01/17/2016 6:32:22 PM PST
by
al baby
(Hi Mom yes I know)
To: amorphous
Experience doesn't support this, i.e. 3 failed attempts so far. There is technology to afford a more stable platform but is expensive. It is a matter of mass and money. Semi submersible offshore drill rigs use dynamic positioning and motion compensated drilling decks to provide a more stable platform.
So far SpaceEx has chosen to use the crudest of barges to provide their offshore landing platforms. Actually it's not rocket science if they really want to recover the first stage offshore.
20
posted on
01/17/2016 7:46:25 PM PST
by
Cannoneer
( "..raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair.." GW)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson